Literature DB >> 20167255

Intra-accumbens rimonabant is rewarding but induces aversion to cocaine in cocaine-treated rats, as does in vivo accumbal cannabinoid CB1 receptor silencing: critical role for glutamate receptors.

S Ramiro-Fuentes1, O Ortiz, R Moratalla, E Fernandez-Espejo.   

Abstract

Reinforcing effects mediated by accumbal CB(1) receptors (CB(1)R) are controversial, as well as their role in the rewarding effects of cocaine. Accumbal glutamate and glutamate receptors have been proposed to be involved in CB(1)R-mediated effects on cocaine reward. Rewarding effects of cocaine can be evaluated with the conditioned place preference or CPP test. Rimonabant, a cannabinoid CB(1)R ligand, lentiviruses aimed at silencing CB(1)R, and selective glutamatergic ligands are good tools for studying the function of accumbal CB(1) and glutamate receptors. The objectives of the present study were (i) to discern the CPP effects of in vivo gene silencing of accumbal CB(1) receptors by means of lentiviruses containing siRNAs; (ii) to discern the CPP effects of intra-accumbens infusions of the cannabinoid CB(1)R ligand rimonabant, and to evaluate whether effects are due to receptor blockade or inverse agonism; (iii) to discern the role of CB(1)R located within the nucleus accumbens shell in the rewarding effects of cocaine, by means of local infusions of rimonabant, and (iv) to discern the role of glutamate receptors (AMPAR, NMDAR, mGluR2/3) in rimonabant-induced effects on CPP in cocaine-treated rats. The findings revealed that in vivo silencing of accumbal CB(1) receptors with Lenti-CB(1)R-siRNAs induced place aversion to cocaine, but intra-accumbal rimonabant induced place preference in its own right, indicating that this compound seems to act as inverse agonist on the CPP. Glutamate receptors participate in rimonabant-mediated place preference because it was abolished after blocking AMPA glutamate receptors, but not NMDAR or mGluR2/3. Finally, in cocaine-treated rats, local rimonabant induced place aversion to the drug (not place preference), and this effect was mediated by glutamate neurotransmission because it was abolished after blockade of AMPA, NMDA or mGlu2/3 receptors, even though only the blockade of mGlu2/3 autoreceptors restored the emergence of place preference to cocaine. (c) 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167255     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  7 in total

1.  Temporally dependent changes in cocaine-induced synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens shell are reversed by D1-like dopamine receptor stimulation.

Authors:  Pavel I Ortinski; Fair M Vassoler; Gregory C Carlson; R Christopher Pierce
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Endocannabinoid Regulation of Reward and Reinforcement through Interaction with Dopamine and Endogenous Opioid Signaling.

Authors:  J M Wenzel; J F Cheer
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Cannabinoid receptor 1-expressing neurons in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Bradley D Winters; Juliane M Krüger; Xiaojie Huang; Zachary R Gallaher; Masago Ishikawa; Krzysztof Czaja; James M Krueger; Yanhua H Huang; Oliver M Schlüter; Yan Dong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cannabinoid receptor activation prevents the effects of chronic mild stress on emotional learning and LTP in a rat model of depression.

Authors:  Amir Segev; Adva S Rubin; Hila Abush; Gal Richter-Levin; Irit Akirav
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Cannabinoid type 1 receptors in A2a neurons contribute to cocaine-environment association.

Authors:  Brandon D Turner; Nicholas K Smith; Kevin M Manz; Betty T Chang; Eric Delpire; Carrie A Grueter; Brad A Grueter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  On the Role of Cannabinoid CB1- and μ-Opioid Receptors in Motor Impulsivity.

Authors:  Joost Wiskerke; Yvar van Mourik; Dustin Schetters; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Tommy Pattij
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Cannabinoid Regulation of Brain Reward Processing with an Emphasis on the Role of CB1 Receptors: A Step Back into the Future.

Authors:  George Panagis; Brian Mackey; Styliani Vlachou
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.157

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.