Literature DB >> 2016668

Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.

T D Wilson1, J W Schooler.   

Abstract

In Study 1, college students' preferences for different brands of strawberry jams were compared with experts' ratings of the jams. Students who analyzed why they felt the way they did agreed less with the experts than students who did not. In Study 2, college students' preferences for college courses were compared with expert opinion. Some students were asked to analyze reasons; others were asked to evaluate all attributes of all courses. Both kinds of introspection caused people to make choices that, compared with control subjects', corresponded less with expert opinion. Analyzing reasons can focus people's attention on nonoptimal criteria, causing them to base their subsequent choices on these criteria. Evaluating multiple attributes can moderate people's judgments, causing them to discriminate less between the different alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2016668     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  69 in total

Review 1.  Broadening behavioral decision research: multiple levels of cognitive processing.

Authors:  D L Medin; M H Bazerman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Justification effects on the judgment of analogy.

Authors:  W R Sieck; C N Quinn; J W Schooler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

3.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Michele M Tugade; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The attraction effect in decision making: superior performance by older adults.

Authors:  Sunghan Kim; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-01

5.  Actually, a picture is worth less than 45 words: narratives produce more false memories than photographs do.

Authors:  Maryanne Garry; Kimberley A Wade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

6.  Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation.

Authors:  Laura R Glasman; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: the case of transitivity.

Authors:  Zohar Rusou; Dan Zakay; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

8.  Intuition versus analysis: strategy and experience in complex everyday problem solving.

Authors:  Jean E Pretz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

9.  Chaos, vulnerability and control: parental beliefs about neonatal clinical trials.

Authors:  F R Ward
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments.

Authors:  Charles C Ballew; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.