Literature DB >> 20166405

Clinical performance of vital bleaching techniques.

Jussara K Bernardon1, Neimar Sartori, Andressa Ballarin, Jorge Perdigão, Guilherme Carpena Lopes, Luiz Narciso Baratieri.   

Abstract

This study compared the clinical outcome of bleaching techniques in vital teeth. After IRB approval and informed consent, 90 subjects were selected based on the shade of their anterior teeth (A2 or darker, Vita Classic shade guide). Subjects were assigned to three treatment groups in a split-mouth study design: Group I: HB (at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide for two weeks) vs OBL (in-office bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide, two sessions, two-week intervals, with light irradiation); Group II: OB (in-office bleaching without light irradiation) vs OBL; Group III: HB vs combination (one session plus HB). Color change and color rebound (deltaE) were measured for a 16-week period. Color measurements were carried out with both a spectrophotometer and a shade guide at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 weeks. Tooth sensitivity was evaluated using a VAS scale for 15 days. Both the Student's t-test and Tukey-Kramer test were used to analyze the results (p < 0.05). After one week, one session of OBL followed by HB resulted in lower color values, compared with the other bleaching methods. Group III resulted in the least shade values at one-week evaluation, when compared with the other bleaching methods. After two weeks, HE alone resulted in similar color changes as OB, OBL and OBL+HB. The use of light irradiation did not improve bleaching efficacy (OB = OBL). OBL and OB resulted in higher sensitivity rates than HB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20166405     DOI: 10.2341/09-008CR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  30 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a desensitizing agent before in-office tooth bleaching in restored teeth.

Authors:  Elize Bonafé; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Alessandra Reis; Stella Kossatz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Are combined bleaching techniques better than their sole application? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas; Bianca Medeiros Maran; Lucila Cristina Rodrigues Araújo; Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Siqueira; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Alessandro D Loguercio; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Perioperative use of an anti-inflammatory drug on tooth sensitivity caused by in-office bleaching: a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Eloisa Andrade de Paula; Alessandro D Loguercio; Daniel Fernandes; Stella Kossatz; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Is personality relevant in the choice of bleaching?

Authors:  A Herrera; J Martín; F Pérez; E Bonafé; A Reis; A Loguercio Dourado; E Fernández
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Determination of nicotine content in teeth submitted to prophylaxis and in-office bleaching by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Authors:  Juliana L de Geus; Flávio L Beltrame; Mei Wang; Bharathi Avula; Ikhlas A Khan; Alessandro D Loguercio; Stella Kossatz; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Tooth whitening: what we now know.

Authors:  Clifton M Carey
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.267

7.  Effect of acidity of in-office bleaching gels on tooth sensitivity and whitening: a two-center double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A D Loguercio; F Servat; R Stanislawczuk; A Mena-Serrano; M Rezende; M V Prieto; V Cereño; M F Rojas; K Ortega; E Fernandez; A Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effects of charcoal-based whitening toothpastes on human enamel in terms of color, surface roughness, and microhardness: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Uzay Koc Vural; Zeynep Bagdatli; Ayfer Ezgi Yilmaz; Filiz Yalçın Çakır; Emre Altundaşar; Sevil Gurgan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Gingival irritation in patients submitted to at-home bleaching with different cutouts of the bleaching tray: a randomized, single-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Taynara S Carneiro; Michael W Favoreto; Laís G Bernardi; Elisama Sutil; Michel Wendlinger; Gabrielle G Centenaro; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro D Loguercio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Comparison of Tooth Color Change After Bleaching With Conventional and Different Light-Activated Methods.

Authors:  Sima Shahabi; Hadi Assadian; Alireza Mahmoudi Nahavandi; Hanieh Nokhbatolfoghahaei
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.