Literature DB >> 20164659

Application of DC beads in hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical and radiological results of a drug delivery device for transcatheter superselective arterial embolization.

Maliha Sadick1, Stephan Haas, Matthias Loehr, Mohammad Elshwi, Manfred V Singer, Joachim Brade, Stefan O Schoenberg, Steffen J Diehl.   

Abstract

AIM: Application of a drug delivery device for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Clinical and radiological treatment assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 24 patients with liver cirrhosis and uni- or multifocal HCC underwent TACE with doxorubicin beads (DC Bead). The underly-ing cause of liver cirrhosis was hepatitis (A: n = 7; B: n = 10) or alcohol consumption (n = 7). Patients presented with Child Pugh stage A (n = 15) and B (n = 9). The mean intrahepatic tumor size, considering the sum of diameters of all lesions treated, was 3.83 cm (+/-2.4). Liver function and hematological parameters were documented before and after each TACE. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed before and 4 weeks after TACE. The T1-w 3D volume-interpolated breathhold exam (VIBE) sequence was applied for evaluation of the therapy response.
RESULTS: 24 patients received a total number of 69 TACE treatments with DC beads (mean dose 160 mg). The elevation of liver function parameters after treatment did not affect the patients' clinical condition. The T1-w VIBE sequence proved very valuable for assessment of the intrahepatic tumor spread. Post-contrast images enabled delineation of the viable HCC lesions, hence facilitating the selective transcatheter approach. The tumor marker a-fetoprotein (AFP), available in 19/24 patients, dropped from 347.5 to 299.5 ng/ml, without being a reliable predictor of treatment response. A decrease of tumor size after TACE from 3.83 (+/-2.40) to 3.01 cm (+/-2.67; p < 0.0001) was evident on the T1w-VIBE sequences. The mean follow-up period was 30 months. At the time of data analysis, 10 (42%) out of 14 patients were alive.
CONCLUSION: TACE with DC beads in HCC offers a safe and efficient treatment resulting in tumor response within a very short time. (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20164659     DOI: 10.1159/000264620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onkologie        ISSN: 0378-584X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter embolization therapy in liver cancer: an update of clinical evidences.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng; Thierry De Baere; Jean-Marc Idée; Sébastien Ballet
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Synthesis and characterization of image-able polyvinyl alcohol microspheres for image-guided chemoembolization.

Authors:  Ayele H Negussie; Matthew R Dreher; Carmen Gacchina Johnson; Yiqing Tang; Andrew L Lewis; Gert Storm; Karun V Sharma; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Anti-angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: current evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Martin-Walter Welker; Joerg Trojan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Transcatheter treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with Doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead (DEBDOX): technical recommendations.

Authors:  Riccardo Lencioni; Thierry de Baere; Marta Burrel; James G Caridi; Johannes Lammer; Katerina Malagari; Robert C G Martin; Elizabeth O'Grady; Maria Isabel Real; Thomas J Vogl; Anthony Watkinson; Jean-Francois H Geschwind
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Effectiveness and safety of doxorubicin loaded beads in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  María Muros-Ortega; Ma Sacramento Díaz-Carrasco; Antonio Capel; Miguel Ángel Calleja; Fernando Martínez
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-08-09

6.  Does drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization improve the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shilong Han; Xiaoping Zhang; Liling Zou; Chenhui Lu; Jun Zhang; Jue Li; Maoquan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.