Literature DB >> 2016446

Adenosine or dipyridamole: which is preferred for myocardial perfusion imaging?

F J Wackers.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1991        PMID： 2016446     DOI： 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80138-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN： 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Comparison between dipyridamole and adenosine as pharmacologic coronary vasodilators in detection of coronary artery disease with thallium 201 imaging.

Authors:  R Taillefer; R Amyot; S Turpin; R Lambert; C Pilon; M Jarry
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Comparison of exercise, dipyridamole, and adenosine by use of technetium 99m sestamibi tomographic imaging.

Authors:  C D Santos-Ocampo; S D Herman; M I Travin; C E Garber; A W Ahlberg; D E Messinger; G V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Adenosine echocardiography--an alternative to dynamic stress echocardiography.

Authors:  V G Kujacic; D Jablonskiene; H U Emanuelsson
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-09

4.  Noninvasive identification of left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease by thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography during adenosine infusion.

Authors:  Y Takeishi; J Chiba; S Abe; A Komatani; K Takahashi; H Tomoike
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.668
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.