Literature DB >> 20164319

Intake during repeated exposure to low- and high-energy-dense yogurts by different means of consumption.

Pleunie S Hogenkamp1, Monica Mars, Annette Stafleu, Cees de Graaf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An important question in the regulation of energy intake is whether dietary learning of energy content depends on the food's characteristics, such as texture. Texture might affect the duration of sensory exposure and eating rate.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate whether a long sensory exposure, due to differences in means of consumption and in viscosity, enhances learned associations between sensory signals and metabolic consequences and hence facilitates energy intake compensation.
DESIGN: A total of 105 healthy young adults with a mean (+/-SD) age of 22 +/- 3 y and a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 21.6 +/- 1.7 participated in a parallel intervention in 3 groups: liquid yogurt with a straw (liquid/straw; n = 34), liquid yogurt with a spoon (liquid/spoon; n = 36), or semisolid yogurt with a spoon (semisolid/spoon; n = 35). Novel flavored yogurts were offered ad libitum for breakfast in 2 energy densities: low ( approximately 215 kJ/100 g) and high ( approximately 600 kJ/100 g). Subjects were repeatedly exposed to the yogurt products (10 times), and yogurt intake was measured.
RESULTS: Intakes (P = 0.01) and eating rates (P = 0.01) were highest in the liquid/straw group. Average intakes over 10 exposures were 575 +/- 260 g for liquid/straw, 475 +/- 192 g for liquid/spoon, and 470 +/- 223 g for semisolid/spoon; average eating rates were 132 +/- 83 g/min for liquid/straw, 106 +/- 53 g/min for liquid/spoon, and 105 +/- 88 g/min for semisolid/spoon. No significant interaction for intake between intervention group, energy density, and repeated exposure was observed, and intakes of the low- and high-energy-dense yogurts did not change over time in any of the intervention groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed no energy intake compensation after repeated exposure to yogurt products. Differences in ad libitum yogurt intake could be explained by eating rate, which was affected by the different means of consumption. This trial was registered with the Dutch trial registration at http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=1853 as NTR1853.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20164319     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  9 in total

1.  Effects of learning and food form on energy intake and appetitive responses.

Authors:  Joshua B Jones; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

Review 2.  Energy density, energy intake, and body weight regulation in adults.

Authors:  J Philip Karl; Susan B Roberts
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Effect of different protein sources on satiation and short-term satiety when consumed as a starter.

Authors:  Rania Abou-Samra; Lian Keersmaekers; Dino Brienza; Rajat Mukherjee; Katherine Macé
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  How oro-sensory exposure and eating rate affect satiation and associated endocrine responses-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Marlou Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Effects of Oro-Sensory Exposure on Satiation and Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms-What Do We Know So Far?

Authors:  Marlou P Lasschuijt; Kees de Graaf; Monica Mars
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Influence of Sensory Properties in Moderating Eating Behaviors and Food Intake.

Authors:  Ciarán G Forde; Kees de Graaf
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-21

7.  Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Catriona M M Lakemond; Rene A de Wijk; Pieternel A Luning; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fluid or fuel? The context of consuming a beverage is important for satiety.

Authors:  Keri McCrickerd; Lucy Chambers; Martin R Yeomans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Oral Exposure Duration and Gastric Energy Content on Appetite Ratings and Energy Intake in Lean Men.

Authors:  Anne G M Wijlens; Cees de Graaf; Alfrun Erkner; Monica Mars
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.