Literature DB >> 20163990

Daclizumab in active relapsing multiple sclerosis (CHOICE study): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on trial with interferon beta.

Daniel Wynn1, Michael Kaufman, Xavier Montalban, Timothy Vollmer, Jack Simon, Jacob Elkins, Gilmore O'Neill, Lauri Neyer, James Sheridan, Chungchi Wang, Alice Fong, John W Rose.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody, reduced multiple sclerosis disease activity in previous non-randomised studies. We aimed to assess whether daclizumab reduces disease activity in patients with active relapsing multiple sclerosis who are receiving interferon beta treatment.
METHODS: We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at 51 centres in the USA, Canada, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Patients with active relapsing multiple sclerosis who were taking interferon beta were randomly assigned to receive add-on subcutaneous daclizumab 2 mg/kg every 2 weeks (interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group), daclizumab 1 mg/kg every 4 weeks (interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab group), or interferon beta and placebo for 24 weeks. The randomisation scheme was generated by Facet Biotech. All patients and assessors were masked to treatment with the exception of Facet Biotech bioanalysts who prepared data for the data safety monitoring board or generated pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic data, a drug accountability auditor, and the site pharmacist. The primary endpoint was total number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions measured on brain MRI scans every 4 weeks between weeks 8 and 24. Effects of daclizumab on prespecified subsets of lymphocytes and quantitative T-cell proliferative response were assessed in an exploratory pharmacodynamic substudy. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00109161.
FINDINGS: From May, 2005, to March, 2006, 288 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 230 were randomly assigned to receive interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab (n=75), interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab (n=78), or interferon beta and placebo (n=77). The adjusted mean number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions was 4.75 in the interferon beta and placebo group compared with 1.32 in the interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group (difference 72%, 95% CI 34% to 88%; p=0.004) and 3.58 in the interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab group (25%, -76% to 68%; p=0.51). In the pharmacodynamic substudy, daclizumab was not associated with significant changes in absolute numbers of T cells, B cells, or natural killer cells, or T-cell proliferative response compared with interferon beta alone. The number of CD56(bright) natural killer cells was seven to eight times higher in both daclizumab groups than in the interferon beta and placebo group (interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab group p=0.002; interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group p<0.0001). Common adverse events were equally distributed across groups.
INTERPRETATION: Add-on daclizumab treatment reduced the number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions compared with interferon beta alone and might reduce multiple sclerosis disease activity to a greater extent than interferon beta alone. FUNDING: Facet Biotech and Biogen Idec. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20163990     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70033-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  106 in total

Review 1.  MRI monitoring of immunomodulation in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis trials.

Authors:  Frederik Barkhof; Jack H Simon; Franz Fazekas; Marco Rovaris; Ludwig Kappos; Nicola de Stefano; Chris H Polman; John Petkau; Ernst W Radue; Maria P Sormani; David K Li; Paul O'Connor; Xavier Montalban; David H Miller; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Intrathecal effects of daclizumab treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B Bielekova; N Richert; M L Herman; J Ohayon; T A Waldmann; H McFarland; R Martin; G Blevins
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Optimizing outcomes in multiple sclerosis: consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis in Latin America.

Authors:  Adriana Carrá; Miguel Ángel Macías-Islas; Alberto Alan Gabbai; Jorge Correale; Carlos Bolaña; Eduardo Duriez Sotelo; Juan García Bonitto; Fernando Vergara-Edwards; Darwin Vizcarra-Escobar
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 4.  Natural killer cells and their receptors in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gurman Kaur; John Trowsdale; Lars Fugger
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Multiple sclerosis review.

Authors:  Marvin M Goldenberg
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-03

6.  Abbott outbids Biogen for Facet's multiple sclerosis antibody.

Authors:  Cormac Sheridan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  The multiple sclerosis market.

Authors:  Trung Huynh
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 8.  Neuroimmunotherapies Targeting T Cells: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Stefan Bittner; Heinz Wiendl
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 9.  Infection risk in patients on multiple sclerosis therapeutics.

Authors:  Eric M Williamson; Joseph R Berger
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  The role of B cells in the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Tohid Gharibi; Zohreh Babaloo; Arezoo Hosseini; Faroogh Marofi; Abbas Ebrahimi-Kalan; Saeed Jahandideh; Behzad Baradaran
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 7.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.