INTRODUCTION: Analyzing data that arises from correlated observations such as husband-wife pairs, siblings, or repeated assessments of the same individuals over time requires more specialized analytic tools. Additionally, outcomes that are not normally distributed such as count data, (e.g., number of symptoms or number of problems endorsed) also require specialized analytic tools. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) are a very flexible tool for dealing with correlated data (such as data derived from related individuals such as families). The objective of this report was to compare traditional ordinary least squares regression (OLS) to a GEE approach for analyzing family data. METHODS: Using data from an ongoing five-wave longitudinal study of newlywed couples, we examined a subset of 173 families with children between the ages of 4 and 11 at two data collection points. The relation between parental risk factors (e.g., heavy drinking, aggression, marital quality) and child internalizing symptoms was examined within the context of two regression-based models: traditional OLS regression and a GEE approach. RESULTS: Overall, the GEE approach allowed a more complete use of the available data, provided more robust findings, and produced more reliable parameter estimates. CONCLUSION: GEE models are a flexible regression-based approach for dealing with related data that arises from correlated data such as family data. Further, given the availability of the models in common statistical programs, family researchers should consider these models for their work. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION: Analyzing data that arises from correlated observations such as husband-wife pairs, siblings, or repeated assessments of the same individuals over time requires more specialized analytic tools. Additionally, outcomes that are not normally distributed such as count data, (e.g., number of symptoms or number of problems endorsed) also require specialized analytic tools. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) are a very flexible tool for dealing with correlated data (such as data derived from related individuals such as families). The objective of this report was to compare traditional ordinary least squares regression (OLS) to a GEE approach for analyzing family data. METHODS: Using data from an ongoing five-wave longitudinal study of newlywed couples, we examined a subset of 173 families with children between the ages of 4 and 11 at two data collection points. The relation between parental risk factors (e.g., heavy drinking, aggression, marital quality) and child internalizing symptoms was examined within the context of two regression-based models: traditional OLS regression and a GEE approach. RESULTS: Overall, the GEE approach allowed a more complete use of the available data, provided more robust findings, and produced more reliable parameter estimates. CONCLUSION:GEE models are a flexible regression-based approach for dealing with related data that arises from correlated data such as family data. Further, given the availability of the models in common statistical programs, family researchers should consider these models for their work. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: David E Jones; Mei Tang; Alonzo Folger; Robert T Ammerman; Md Monir Hossain; Jodie Short; Judith B Van Ginkel Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2017-10-23
Authors: Julie Barsalou; Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau; Adey Berhanu; Cesar Fors-Nieves; Ummara Shah; Patrick Brown; Carl A Laskin; Nathalie Morel; Kateri Levesque; Jill P Buyon; Earl D Silverman; Peter M Izmirly Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Alice P Villatoro; Jo C Phelan; Kris Painter; Kay Barkin; Bruce G Link Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Tahir Ahmed Hassen; Catherine Chojenta; Nicholas Egan; Deborah Loxton Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jae-Hyun Kim; Ki-Bong Yoo; Eun-Cheol Park; Sang Gyu Lee; Tae Hyun Kim Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 3.186