Literature DB >> 20163882

Role of endoscopic nasal examination in reduction of nasopharyngeal adenoid recurrence rates.

Waleed F Ezzat1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit of endoscopic examination after adenoidectomy in detecting residual adenoid tissue that would need completion surgery, in ultimate aim to reduce rates of adenoid recurrence.
METHODS: A total of 312 children were included in the study conducted at Ain-Shams University Hospital from January till December 2007, following routine adenoidectomy, 118 had a nasal and nasopharyngeal rigid fiberoptic examination and 194 did not, randomly according to the surgical subunit that performed the surgery. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years for recurrence of symptoms of adenoid enlargement.
RESULTS: Endoscopic examination revealed that 14.5% of patients undergoing adenoidectomy had residual adenoid tissue that needed further removal, of these the most common site was at the lateral walls of the nasopharynx (47%). The recurrence rate of adenoid hypertrophy needing re-surgery with endoscopic examination (0.85%) approaches that of the lowest recorded (0.5%) with more expensive and costly methods, and statistically significant lower than rates when endoscopy is not performed (5.6%). Additional time needed for such examination was negligible in terms of cost-benefit relationship.
CONCLUSION: Rigid fiberoptic endoscopy of the posterior choana and nasopharynx at the end of adenoidectomy provides the benefit of detecting unremoved adenoid tissue without significantly extra cost, time, nor expertise, and helps reduce significantly the rates of recurrence of adenoid enlargement, which might be attributed to residual "missed" adenoid tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20163882     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  6 in total

1.  Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.

Authors:  Mosaad Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Changing Trends in Adenoidectomy.

Authors:  Vanika Anand; Vanita Sarin; Baldev Singh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-24

3.  Revision adenoidectomy in children: residual vs regrowth?

Authors:  Hassan A Elhassan; Gülpembe Bozkurt; I Emrah Emre
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Kamil Gokce Tulaci; Erhan Arslan; Tugba Tulaci; Aziz Dinek; Hasmet Yazici
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Is transnasal endoscopic examination necessary before and after adenoidectomy?

Authors:  Yavuz Selim Yıldırım; Tayfun Apuhan; Fadlullah Aksoy; Bayram Veyseller; Orhan Ozturan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-06

6.  Comparison between curettage adenoidectomy and endoscopic-assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy in terms of Eustachian tube dysfunction.

Authors:  Mahmut Huntürk Atilla; Selda Kargın Kaytez; Gülin Gökçen Kesici; Sibel Baştimur; Sebahattin Tuncer
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.