Literature DB >> 20163690

Red blood cell hemolysis during blood bank storage: using national quality management data to answer basic scientific questions.

John R Hess1, Rosemary L Sparrow, Pieter F van der Meer, Jason P Acker, Rebecca A Cardigan, Dana V Devine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemolysis of red blood cells (RBCs) during blood bank storage is the most obvious manifestation of RBC storage system failure. However, its analysis is made difficult because the largest source of interunit difference is donor specific. Availability of data from national blood systems on large numbers of RBC units used for internal quality control (QC) purposes and stored and processed in uniform ways permits statistical analysis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Measures of hemolysis during and at the end of storage on randomly selected donor units observed for QC purposes were obtained from four national blood systems. Groups of these measures from units that had undergone similar processing and storage were sorted to create histograms and the histograms were compared statistically.
RESULTS: A total of 14,087 measures were obtained under seven storage conditions, including more than 12,000 measures made in a single country under four closely related conditions. Distributions of percent hemolysis are skewed normal and outliers are random. Additive solutions appear to be equivalent, except that the 42 mmol/L mannitol in AS-1 reduces hemolysis compared to conventional 30 mmol/L mannitol in saline, adenine, glucose, and mannitol. Increasing storage from 35 to 42 days increased measured hemolysis by 30% and leukoreduction decreased it by 53%.
CONCLUSIONS: Large national data sets provide useful information about the distribution of hemolysis at the end of RBC storage. This information can aid blood storage system development and regulatory science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20163690     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  42 in total

Review 1.  Red blood cell components: time to revisit the sources of variability.

Authors:  Rosemary L Sparrow
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Red blood cell storage: the story so far.

Authors:  Angelo D'Alessandro; Giancarlo Liumbruno; Giuliano Grazzini; Lello Zolla
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  Conventional blood banking and blood component storage regulation: opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  John R Hess
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Red blood cell storage and transfusion-related immunomodulation.

Authors:  Rosemary L Sparrow
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Time to revisit red blood cell additive solutions and storage conditions: a role for "omics" analyses.

Authors:  Rosemary L Sparrow
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 6.  Cumulative erythrocyte damage in blood storage and relevance to massive transfusions: selective insights into serial morphological and biochemical findings.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Putter; Jerard Seghatchian
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  Storage of Red Blood Cells and Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury.

Authors:  Arkady Babaev; Federico Pozzi; Gregory Hare; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  J Anesth Crit Care       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 8.  Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences.

Authors:  Tatsuro Yoshida; Michel Prudent; Angelo D'alessandro
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 9.  Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?

Authors:  Willy A Flegel; Charles Natanson; Harvey G Klein
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  The heritability of hemolysis in stored human red blood cells.

Authors:  Thomas J Van 't Erve; Brett A Wagner; Sean M Martin; C Michael Knudson; Robyn Blendowski; Mignon Keaton; Tracy Holt; John R Hess; Garry R Buettner; Kelli K Ryckman; Benjamin W Darbro; Jeffrey C Murray; Thomas J Raife
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.