Literature DB >> 20163560

Beyond (financial) accessibility: inequalities within the medicalisation of infertility.

Ann V Bell1.   

Abstract

There is a significant class disparity within the provision of medical treatments for infertility in the United States. Common explanations attribute this inequality to financial inaccessibility due to sparse insurance coverage and exorbitant costs. However, little is known as to why disparities still exist without the presence of such constraints, such as in states with comprehensive insurance coverage of infertility treatments. Drawing on in-depth interviews with women of low socioeconomic status (SES), this paper aims to explore the structural and political barriers to receiving medical care for infertility within the United States context. The paper argues that much of the invisible, unidentified treatment disparities of infertility stem from the social control mechanism of medicalisation. Medicalisation perpetuates the stratified system of reproduction through its structural inaccessibility and the institutionalised classism apparent within medicine's reproductive health practices and policies. The women in this study, however, actively and creatively identified ways to overcome the reproductive limits with which they were faced. In doing so, their solutions served both to accept and reject dominant norms of motherhood and medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20163560     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01235.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  9 in total

1.  Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Katherine J Sapra; Rosalind B King; Jean Fredo Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Expecting motherhood? Stratifying reproduction in twenty-first century Scottish abortion practice.

Authors:  Siân M Beynon-Jones
Journal:  Sociology       Date:  2013-06-01

3.  Sociodemographic differences in utilization of fertility services among reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer in the USA.

Authors:  Paxton Voigt; Jesse Persily; Jennifer K Blakemore; Frederick Licciardi; Sameer Thakker; Bobby Najari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  A New Way to Estimate the Potential Unmet Need for Infertility Services Among Women in the United States.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen S Slauson-Blevins; Stacy Tiemeyer; Julia McQuillan; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Pathways to Parenthood in Social and Family Context: Decade in Review, 2020.

Authors:  Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-05

6.  Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts - A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Wieteke van Dijk; Marjan J Meinders; Marit A C Tanke; Gert P Westert; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-08-01

7.  'Just have some IVF!': A longitudinal ethnographic study of couples' experiences of seeking fertility treatment.

Authors:  Ginny Mounce; Helen T Allan; Nicola Carey
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2022-01-25

8.  Pituitary hyperplasia with Sertoli cell-only and 47,XYY syndromes: an uncommon triad.

Authors:  Amelle Geurim Ra; Paul Jeffrey Evans; Anshu Awasthi; Upendram Srinivas-Shankar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-14

9.  Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men.

Authors:  J Datta; M J Palmer; C Tanton; L J Gibson; K G Jones; W Macdowall; A Glasier; P Sonnenberg; N Field; C H Mercer; A M Johnson; K Wellings
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.918

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.