Literature DB >> 20162866

Genetic testing offered directly after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a pilot study on the reactions of patients.

K M Landsbergen1, J B Prins, H G Brunner, N Hoogerbrugge.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Genetic testing offered directly after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a pilot study on the reactions of patients:
INTRODUCTION: When colorectal cancer is diagnosed before the age of 50 years, then consideration should be given to a hereditary cause. Indications of heredity can be found in tumour tissue with the aid of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. A positive MSI test means an increased risk of hereditary colorectal cancer, the so-called Lynch syndrome. Until recently, the usual approach was to postpone genetic testing for colorectal cancer until the family history had been studied extensively and information had been made available by a clinical geneticist about the possible consequences. However, it is now possible for MSI testing to be performed on the initiative of the pathologist when the newly diagnosed patient with colorectal cancer is younger than 50 years. This speeds up the procedure considerably. The psychological effects of discussing genetic testing and referring patients during treatment for colorectal cancer are currently unknown. This paper describes an exploratory study on the experience of eight colorectal cancer patients with the new Lynch syndrome detection strategy.
METHODS: The patients were interviewed at home using a semistructured questionnaire based on the multicausal model of problem analysis and adapted with items for colorectal cancer and genetic testing.
RESULTS: Three coordinating themes were found: (1) 'a changed life after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer', (2) 'warning for the future' and (3) 'communication with family'. It was a considerable challenge for these patients to cope with the physical and psychosocial consequences of colorectal cancer. The majority regarded possible carriership of a hereditary disposition for the Lynch syndrome as useful medico-preventive knowledge for their children. The timing of the confrontation with genetic testing was considered to save time in receiving follow-up advice for their children. However, these patients were apprehensive about having to discuss a hereditary disposition for cancer with their family.
CONCLUSION: In this early phase, coping with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and the consequences of treatment mainly determined the reactions of these patients and their physical well-being. This small group of patients was of the opinion that the advantages of genetic testing will weigh-up against the disadvantages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20162866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Couns        ISSN: 1015-8146


  7 in total

Review 1.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Rita D DeBate; Tuya Pal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Valuations of genetic test information for treatable conditions: the case of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Vikram Kilambi; F Reed Johnson; Juan Marcos González; Ateesha F Mohamed
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 4.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Psychological distress in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients following microsatellite instability testing for Lynch syndrome on the pathologist's initiative.

Authors:  K M Landsbergen; J B Prins; H G Brunner; P van Duijvendijk; F M Nagengast; J H van Krieken; M Ligtenberg; N Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  What would I do? Perspectives on the factors underlying Lynch syndrome genetic testing and results sharing decisions for high-risk colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Gabriella Tiernan; Victoria Freeman; April Morrow; Emily Hogden; Karen Canfell; Yoon-Jung Kang; Natalie Taylor
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  DNA-testing for BRCA1/2 prior to genetic counselling in patients with breast cancer: design of an intervention study, DNA-direct.

Authors:  Aisha S Sie; Liesbeth Spruijt; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Marjolijn J Ligtenberg; Han G Brunner; Judith B Prins; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.