Literature DB >> 20162251

[Diagnostics in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism].

S M Schellong1.   

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (venous thromboembolism) have a prevalence as high as 1-2/1000/year. Timely diagnosis and therapy prevent or reduce the acute life threatening and the long term disabling complications. Due to the variability in its signs and symptoms, venous thromboembolism should frequently be considered as a differential diagnosis. When doing so, only one in five or six suspected cases actually will have the disease. A low estimate of the clinical probability in conjunction with a negative D-Dimer test may rule out the diagnosis in 40-50% of cases. All other patients need imaging procedures. Current standard of care for deep vein thrombosis is venous ultrasound of the leg, for pulmonary embolism it is CT pulmonary angiography. Sensitivity and specificity of both methods are high enough to allow for a definitive diagnosis. Diagnostic challenges remain the suspicion of relapsing disease and venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20162251     DOI: 10.1007/s00108-009-2513-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Internist (Berl)        ISSN: 0020-9554            Impact factor:   0.743


  27 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  S Goodacre; F Sampson; M Stevenson; A Wailoo; A Sutton; S Thomas; T Locker; A Ryan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Venous ultrasonography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients: an updated review.

Authors:  Sebastian M Schellong
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.155

Review 3.  Systematic review: the Trousseau syndrome revisited: should we screen extensively for cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism?

Authors:  Marc Carrier; Grégoire Le Gal; Philip S Wells; Dean Fergusson; Tim Ramsay; Marc A Rodger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Philip S Wells; David R Anderson; Marc Rodger; Melissa Forgie; Clive Kearon; Jonathan Dreyer; George Kovacs; Michael Mitchell; Bernard Lewandowski; Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis.

Authors:  R Hull; J Hirsh; D L Sackett; D W Taylor; C Carter; A G Turpie; P Powers; M Gent
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Accuracy of complete compression ultrasound in ruling out suspected deep venous thrombosis in the ambulatory setting. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marie-Antoinette Sevestre; José Labarère; Pierre Casez; Luc Bressollette; Mébarka Taiar; Gilles Pernod; Isabelle Quéré; Jean-Luc Bosson
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  The diagnostic value of compression ultrasonography in patients with suspected recurrent deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni; Anthonie W A Lensing; Enrico Bernardi; Sabina Villalta; Paola Bagatella; Antonio Girolami
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 8.  Should patients with venous thromboembolism be screened for thrombophilia?

Authors:  James E Dalen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Is it worth diagnosing and treating distal deep vein thrombosis? No.

Authors:  M Righini
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 10.  Excluding venous thromboembolism using point of care D-dimer tests in outpatients: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  G J Geersing; K J M Janssen; R Oudega; L Bax; A W Hoes; J B Reitsma; K G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-14
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [The patient with pulmonary embolism or vascular emergency requiring intensive care].

Authors:  S M Schellong
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  [Leg swelling].

Authors:  S M Schellong; U Wollina; L Unger; J Machetanz; C Stelzner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.743

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.