Literature DB >> 20162093

Identifying hearing loss by means of iridology.

Natalie Stearn1, De Wet Swanepoel.   

Abstract

Isolated reports of hearing loss presenting as markings on the iris exist, but to date the effectiveness of iridology to identify hearing loss has not been investigated. This study therefore aimed to determine the efficacy of iridological analysis in the identification of moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss in adolescents. A controlled trial was conducted with an iridologist, blind to the actual hearing status of participants, analyzing the irises of participants with and without hearing loss. Fifty hearing impaired and fifty normal hearing subjects, between the ages of 15 and 19 years, controlled for gender, participated in the study. An experienced iridologist analyzed the randomised set of participants' irises. A 70% correct identification of hearing status was obtained by iridological analyses with a false negative rate of 41% compared to a 19% false positive rate. The respective sensitivity and specificity rates therefore came to 59% and 81%. Iridological analysis of hearing status indicated a statistically significant relationship to actual hearing status (P < 0.05). Although statistically significant sensitivity and specificity rates for identifying hearing loss by iridology were not comparable to those of traditional audiological screening procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiology; Hearing loss; Iridology; Screening

Year:  2006        PMID: 20162093      PMCID: PMC2816452          DOI: 10.4314/ajtcam.v4i2.31209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med        ISSN: 2505-0044


  7 in total

1.  Articles on complementary medicine in the mainstream medical literature: an investigation of MEDLINE, 1966 through 1996.

Authors:  J Barnes; N C Abbot; E F Harkness; E Ernst
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999 Aug 9-23

2.  Iridology: not useful and potentially harmful.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01

3.  Iris color and hearing loss.

Authors:  R N Kleinstein; M R Seitz; T E Barton; C R Smith
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1984-03

4.  Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.

Authors:  A L Mehl; V Thomson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Evaluation of otoacoustic emissions in high-risk infants by using an easy and rapid objective auditory screening method.

Authors:  P K Plinkert; G Sesterhenn; R Arold; H P Zenner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  Albert L Mehl; Vickie Thomson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Providing Complementary and Alternative Medicine in primary care: the primary care workers' perspective.

Authors:  R A van Haselen; U Reiber; I Nickel; A Jakob; P A G Fisher
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.446

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.