Literature DB >> 20162028

Use of porous polyethylene for correcting defects of temporal region following transposition of temporalis myofascial flap.

A Baj1, S Spotti, S Marelli, G A Beltramini, A B Giannì.   

Abstract

Transposition of the temporalis myofascial flap results in permanent aesthetic stigma in the donor site. Reconstruction of this deformity is desirable. The Authors present personal experience in the use of a porous polyethylene prosthesis to camouflage the temporal defects following transposition of the temporalis myofascial flap. From 2002 to 2005, 12 patients (5 male, 7 female, age range 36-84 years, mean 60), following the transposition of the temporalis myofascial flap, underwent reconstruction of the temporal region defect using porous high-density polyethylene temporal implants. The majority of the neoplasms removed proved to be squamous cell carcinomas of the alveolar crest or of the sinusal antrum. The standard surgical technique was used, namely, hemicoronal access and placement of 12 porous high-density polyethylene prostheses (5 left, 7 right). The size of the implants to be used (small, medium, large) was decided during the surgical operation. Of the 12 patients, 2 underwent post-operative radiotherapy, 6 weeks after the implantation of the prosthesis, without adopting any particular precautions to protect the area directly involved in the prosthesis implant. All patients are alive and free from disease, and implant placement appears to be free from post-operative complications. During the period of radiotherapy no complications. directly or indirectly related to the prosthetic implant, arose. Placement of the high-density polyethylene prosthesis fulfilled its filling effect on the deficit with a cosmetic success rate of 90%, as it was well integrated with no evident discontinuity between the edges of the prosthesis and the surrounding tissue or any alteration in the physiological convexity of the treated region. There were no incidents of pain or dysaesthesia of the skin covering the prosthesis. In conclusion, reconstruction of the temporal defect after temporalis myofascial flap transposition with the use of high-density polyethylene implants is an easy and safe method, with excellent functional and aesthetic results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High density polyethylene; Maxillectomy; Temporalis myofascial flap

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20162028      PMCID: PMC2821130     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  14 in total

1.  Craniofacial reconstruction with high-density porous polyethylene implants.

Authors:  Adnan Menderes; Caghan Baytekin; Alpaslan Topcu; Mustafa Yilmaz; Ali Barutcu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 2.  Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Rubin; M J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The use of temporal polyethylene implant after temporalis myofascial flap transposition: clinical and radiographic results from its use in 21 patients.

Authors:  Alexander D Rapidis; Terry A Day
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Maxillectomy and its classification.

Authors:  R H Spiro; E W Strong; J P Shah
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 5.  Synthetic biomaterials in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  P D Costantino; C D Friedman; A Lane
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.446

6.  Use of porous high-density polyethylene implants in temporal contour reconstruction.

Authors:  M Lacey; O Antonyshyn
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  The temporalis muscle flap in oral reconstruction. A cadaveric, animal and clinical study.

Authors:  P Bradley; J Brockbank
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1981-08

8.  Health-related quality of life after maxillectomy: a comparison between prosthetic obturation and free flap.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Derek Lowe; Deborah McNally; James S Brown; E David Vaughan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  The utility of the temporalis muscle flap for oropharyngeal, base of tongue, and nasopharyngeal reconstruction.

Authors:  Jesse E Smith; Yadranko Ducic; Robert Adelson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Temporalis myofascial flap for maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  C Colmenero; V Martorell; B Colmenero; I Sierra
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  4 in total

1.  Anterior cranial base reconstruction with a reverse temporalis muscle flap and calvarial bone graft.

Authors:  Seung Gee Kwon; Yong Oock Kim; Dong Kyun Rah
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

2.  Reconstruction of palatomaxillary defects following cancer ablation with temporalis muscle flap in medically compromised patients: a 15-year single institutional experience.

Authors:  Yanling Wang; Jie Cheng; Chunping Yuan; Zhongwu Li; Dongmiao Wang; Xu Ding; Jinhai Ye; Heming Wu; Linzhong Wan; Zhenjiang Tao; Hongbing Jiang; Yunong Wu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The reconstruction of nasal septal perforation with high density porous polyethylene covered with fascia lata: an experimental study on rabbit model.

Authors:  Güven Yildirim; Vedat Onar; Ibrahim Sayin; Suzan Deniz Onol; Tamer Aydin
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study.

Authors:  Mansour Khorasani; Pejman Janbaz; Farshid Rayati
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.