Literature DB >> 2016177

Age adjustment factors, heritabilities and genetic correlations for scrotal circumference and related growth traits in Hereford and Brangus bulls.

L A Kriese1, J K Bertrand, L L Benyshek.   

Abstract

Field data records on 10,511 Hereford and 2,522 Brangus bulls between 330 and 430 d of age were analyzed to find age of calf and age of dam adjustment factors for yearling scrotal circumference. Age of calf adjustment factors were .024 cm/d for Hereford bulls and .041 cm/d for Brangus bulls. Sons of Hereford dams were adjusted to a 6- to 8-yr dam age basis by adding .7, .3, .2, .2 or .3 cm for dams 2, 3, 4, 5 or 8 or more years old, respectively. Age of dam adjustment factors for Brangus bulls were .8, .4, .3 and .2 for dams 2, 3, 4 or 8 or more years old, respectively. Variance and covariance components for yearling scrotal circumference and several growth traits were estimated within breed using multiple-trait models and pseudo expectations involving the solutions and the right-hand sides of the mixed-model equations. Additive heritability estimates for yearling scrotal circumference of .53 and .16 were found for Hereford and Brangus bulls, respectively. Maternal heritability estimates of .12 and .10 were found for Hereford and Brangus bulls, respectively. Genetic correlations between yearling scrotal circumference and other growth traits were positive for both sets of data indicating that selection for yearling scrotal circumference should not adversely affect other growth traits in either breed. Environmental correlation estimates between yearling scrotal circumference and adjusted birth weight and between yearling scrotal circumference and adjusted 205-d weight and adjusted 365-d height were positive and moderate in magnitude for both breeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2016177     DOI: 10.2527/1991.692478x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Differential response from selection for high calving ease vs. low birth weight in American Simmental beef cattle.

Authors:  Hamad M Saad; Milton G Thomas; Scott E Speidel; Richard K Peel; W Marshall Frasier; R Mark Enns
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Realized sampling variances of estimates of genetic parameters and the difference between genetic and phenotypic correlations.

Authors:  K R Koots; J P Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Exploring biological relationships between calving traits in primiparous cattle with a Bayesian recursive model.

Authors:  Evangelina López de Maturana; Xiao-Lin Wu; Daniel Gianola; Kent A Weigel; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Modeling relationships between calving traits: a comparison between standard and recursive mixed models.

Authors:  Evangelina López de Maturana; Gustavo de los Campos; Xiao-Lin Wu; Daniel Gianola; Kent A Weigel; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Genetic Parameters of Pre-adjusted Body Weight Growth and Ultrasound Measures of Body Tissue Development in Three Seedstock Pig Breed Populations in Korea.

Authors:  Yun Ho Choy; Alam Mahboob; Chung Il Cho; Jae Gwan Choi; Im Soo Choi; Tae Jeong Choi; Kwang Hyun Cho; Byoung Ho Park
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Influence of model selection and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters in honeybee populations.

Authors:  Manuel Du; Richard Bernstein; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.154

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.