Literature DB >> 20161510

Robust Satisficing Linear Regression: performance/robustness trade-off and consistency criterion.

Miriam Zacksenhouse1, Simona Nemets, Mikhail A Lebedev, Miguel A L Nicolelis.   

Abstract

Linear regression quantifies the linear relationship between paired sets of input and output observations. The well known least-squares regression optimizes the performance criterion defined by the residual error, but is highly sensitive to uncertainties or perturbations in the observations. Robust least-squares algorithms have been developed to optimize the worst case performance for a given limit on the level of uncertainty, but they are applicable only when that limit is known. Herein, we present a robust-satisficing approach that maximizes the robustness to uncertainties in the observations, while satisficing a critical sub-optimal level of performance. The method emphasizes the trade-off between performance and robustness, which are inversely correlated. To resolve the resulting trade-off we introduce a new criterion, which assesses the consistency between the observations and the linear model. The proposed criterion determines a unique robust-satisficing regression and reveals the underlying level of uncertainty in the observations with only weak assumptions. These algorithms are demonstrated for the challenging application of linear regression to neural decoding for brain-machine interfaces. The model-consistent robust-satisfying regression provides superior performance for new observations under both similar and different conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161510      PMCID: PMC2798596          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Syst Signal Process        ISSN: 0888-3270            Impact factor:   6.823


  6 in total

1.  Actions from thoughts.

Authors:  M A Nicolelis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates.

Authors:  J Wessberg; C R Stambaugh; J D Kralik; P D Beck; M Laubach; J K Chapin; J Kim; S J Biggs; M A Srinivasan; M A Nicolelis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices.

Authors:  Dawn M Taylor; Stephen I Helms Tillery; Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Brain-machine interfaces to restore motor function and probe neural circuits.

Authors:  Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Cortical ensemble adaptation to represent velocity of an artificial actuator controlled by a brain-machine interface.

Authors:  Mikhail A Lebedev; Jose M Carmena; Joseph E O'Doherty; Miriam Zacksenhouse; Craig S Henriquez; Jose C Principe; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates.

Authors:  Jose M Carmena; Mikhail A Lebedev; Roy E Crist; Joseph E O'Doherty; David M Santucci; Dragan F Dimitrov; Parag G Patil; Craig S Henriquez; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Robust versus optimal strategies for two-alternative forced choice tasks.

Authors:  M Zacksenhouse; R Bogacz; P Holmes
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Sparse decoding of multiple spike trains for brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Ariel Tankus; Itzhak Fried; Shy Shoham
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 5.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.