Literature DB >> 20160169

Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitor in detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation: Results of the XPECT trial.

Gerhard Hindricks1, Evgueny Pokushalov, Lubos Urban, Milos Taborsky, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Dmitry Lebedev, Guido Rieger, Helmut Pürerfellner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current methods for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) have limited diagnostic yield. Continuous monitoring with automatic arrhythmia detection and classification may improve detection of symptomatic and asymptomatic AF and subsequent patient treatment. The study purpose was to quantify the performance of the first implantable leadless cardiac monitor (ICM) with dedicated AF detection capabilities. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (n=247) with an implanted ICM (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) who were likely to present with paroxysmal AF were selected. A special Holter device stored 46 hours of subcutaneously recorded ECG, ICM markers, and 2 surface ECG leads. The ICM automatic arrhythmia classification was compared with the core laboratory classification of the surface ECG. Of the 206 analyzable Holter recordings collected, 76 (37%) contained at least 1 episode of core laboratory classified AF. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for identifying patients with any AF were 96.1%, 85.4%, 79.3%, and 97.4%, respectively. The AF burden measured with the ICM was very well correlated with the reference value derived from the Holter (Pearson coefficient=0.97). The overall accuracy of the ICM for detecting AF was 98.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: In this ICM validation study, the dedicated AF detection algorithm reliably detected the presence or absence of AF and the AF burden was accurately quantified. The ICM is a promising new diagnostic and monitoring tool for the clinician to treat AF patients independently of symptoms. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefits of the technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20160169     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.877852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  92 in total

1.  Controversies in cardioembolic stroke.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wessler; David M Kent
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-01

2.  ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

Authors:  Sergio Dubner; Angelo Auricchio; Jonathan S Steinberg; Panos Vardas; Peter Stone; Josep Brugada; Ryszard Piotrowicz; David L Hayes; Paulus Kirchhof; Günter Breithardt; Wojciech Zareba; Claudio Schuger; Mehmet K Aktas; Michal Chudzik; Suneet Mittal; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Phased multipolar radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation is as effective and safe as conventional irrigated point-to-point ablation. A prospective randomised 1-year implantable cardiac monitoring device follow-up trial.

Authors:  S J Podd; A N Sulke; C Sugihara; S S Furniss
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Implantable loop recorder monitoring after concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF): insights from more than 200 continuously monitored patients.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Muhammet Ali Aydin; Teymour Ahmadzade; Friederike Hartel; Boris Hoffmann; Daniel Steven; Stephan Willems; Hermann Reichenspurner; Florian Mathias Wagner
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  [Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. From the standard ECG to analysis of electrograms].

Authors:  Malte Meesmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-06

6.  Surveillance of AF recurrence post-surgical AF ablation using implantable cardiac monitor.

Authors:  John H Ip; Maria Viqar-Syed; Denise Grimes; Yan Xie; Kevin Jager; Jennifer Boak; Divyakant Gandhi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation ablation and event recorder implantation: better monitoring, better outcome?

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Timm Schäfer; Friederike Hartel; Teymour Ahmadzade; Irina Subbotina; Hermann Reichenspurner; Florian Matthias Wagner
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-16

8.  Cost Effectiveness of Implantable Cardiac Monitor-Guided Intermittent Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis of the REACT.COM Pilot Study.

Authors:  Daniel A Steinhaus; Peter J Zimetbaum; Rod S Passman; Peter Leong-Sit; Matthew R Reynolds
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-10-04

9.  Incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders in unexplained stroke.

Authors:  Paul E Cotter; Peter J Martin; Liam Ring; Elizabeth A Warburton; Mark Belham; Peter J Pugh
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Advances in the Detection and Monitoring of Atrial Fibrillation for Patients with Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Rajbeer Singh Sangha; Richard Bernstein
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.