Literature DB >> 20159793

Comet sensitivity in assessing DNA damage and repair in different cell cycle stages.

Darragh G McArt1, George McKerr, Kurt Saetzler, C Vyvyan Howard, C Stephen Downes, Gillian R Wasson.   

Abstract

The comet assay is a sensitive tool for estimation of DNA damage and repair at the cellular level, requiring only a very small number of cells. In comparing the levels of damage or repair in different cell samples, it is possible that small experimental effects could be confounded by different cell cycle states in the samples examined, if sensitivity to DNA damage, and repair capacity, varies with the cell cycle. We assessed this by arresting HeLa cells in various cell cycle stages and then exposing them to ionizing radiation. Unirradiated cells demonstrated significant differences in strand break levels measured by the comet assay (predominantly single-strand breaks) at different cell cycle stages, increasing from G(1) into S and falling again in G(2). Over and above this variation in endogenous strand break levels, a significant difference in susceptibility to breaks induced by 3.5 Gy ionizing radiation was also evident in different cell cycle phases. Levels of induced DNA damage fluctuate throughout the cycle, with cells in G(1) showing slightly lower levels of damage than an asynchronous population. Damage increases as cells progress through S phase before falling again towards the end of S phase and reaching lowest levels in M phase. The results from repair experiments (where cells were allowed to repair for 10 min after exposure to ionizing radiation) also showed differences throughout the cell cycle with G(1)-phase cells apparently being the most efficient at repair and M-phase cells the least efficient. We suggest, therefore, that in experiments where small differences in DNA damage and repair are to be investigated with the comet assay, it may be desirable to arrest cells in a specific stage of the cell cycle or to allow for differential cycle distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20159793     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geq006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  9 in total

1.  Pulmonary exposure to carbon black by inhalation or instillation in pregnant mice: effects on liver DNA strand breaks in dams and offspring.

Authors:  Petra Jackson; Karin Sørig Hougaard; Anne Mette Z Boisen; Nicklas Raun Jacobsen; Keld Alstrup Jensen; Peter Møller; Gunnar Brunborg; Kristine Bjerve Gutzkow; Ole Andersen; Steffen Loft; Ulla Vogel; Håkan Wallin
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 2.  DNA repair: from genome maintenance to biomarker and therapeutic target.

Authors:  Shadia Jalal; Jennifer N Earley; John J Turchi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Inducible activation of Cre recombinase in adult mice causes gastric epithelial atrophy, metaplasia, and regenerative changes in the absence of "floxed" alleles.

Authors:  Won Jae Huh; Indira U Mysorekar; Jason C Mills
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Improving the efficacy of chemoradiation with targeted agents.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 39.397

5.  Monascuspiloin enhances the radiation sensitivity of human prostate cancer cells by stimulating endoplasmic reticulum stress and inducing autophagy.

Authors:  Hui-Wen Chiu; Wen-Hung Fang; Yen-Lin Chen; Ming-Der Wu; Gwo-Fang Yuan; Sheng-Yow Ho; Ying-Jan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Radiation, inflammation and the immune response in cancer.

Authors:  Kelly J McKelvey; Amanda L Hudson; Michael Back; Tom Eade; Connie I Diakos
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Ultrasound-induced new cellular mechanism involved in drug resistance.

Authors:  Mariame A Hassan; Yukihiro Furusawa; Masami Minemura; Natalya Rapoport; Toshiro Sugiyama; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, enhances radiosensitivity and suppresses lung metastasis in breast cancer in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Hui-Wen Chiu; Ya-Ling Yeh; Yi-Ching Wang; Wei-Jan Huang; Yi-An Chen; Yi-Shiou Chiou; Sheng-Yow Ho; Pinpin Lin; Ying-Jan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  DNA Damage Responses during the Cell Cycle: Insights from Model Organisms and Beyond.

Authors:  Delisa E Clay; Donald T Fox
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.