Literature DB >> 20159384

Optimization of initial energy for cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias with biphasic shocks.

Johann Reisinger1, Christine Gstrein, Thomas Winter, Eduard Zeindlhofer, Kurt Höllinger, Michael Mori, Alexandra Schiller, Andreas Winter, Helmut Geiger, Peter Siostrzonek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for optimal first-shock energies with biphasic waveforms are conflicting. We evaluated prospectively the relation between type and duration of atrial tachyarrhythmias and the probability of successful cardioversion with a specific biphasic shock waveform to develop recommendations for the initial energy setting aiming at the lowest total cumulative energy with 2 or less consecutive shocks.
METHODS: We analyzed 453 consecutive patients undergoing their first transthoracic electrical cardioversion, including 358 attempts for atrial fibrillation (AF) and 95 attempts for atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT). A step-up protocol with a truncated exponential biphasic waveform starting at 50 J was used. Total cumulative energies were estimated under the assumption of a 2-tiered escalating shock protocol with different initial energy settings and a "rescue shock" of 250 J for AFL/AT or 360 J for AF. The initial energy setting leading to the lowest total cumulative energy was regarded as the optimal first-shock level.
RESULTS: Cardioversion was successful in 448 patients (cumulative efficacy, 99 %). In patients with AFL/AT, the lowest total cumulative energy was attained with an initial energy setting of 50 J. In patients with AF, lowest values were achieved with an initial energy of 100 J for arrhythmia durations of 2 days or less and an initial energy of 150 J for arrhythmia durations of more than 2 days.
CONCLUSION: We recommend an initial energy setting of 50 J in patients with AFL/AT, of 100 J in patients with AF 2 days or less, and of 150 J with AF more than 2 days. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20159384     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of tachyarrhythmias in pregnancy - A review.

Authors:  Priyanka Kugamoorthy; Danna A Spears
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 2.  [Therapy of atrial fibrillation in the critically ill].

Authors:  T Willich; M Hammwöhner; A Goette
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  Cardioversion in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hermann H Klein; Hans-Joachim Trappe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Naqash J Sethi; Sanam Safi; Emil E Nielsen; Joshua Feinberg; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-06

Review 5.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.