BACKGROUND: Fear of side effects and previous negative experiences are common reasons for contraceptive nonuse. STUDY DESIGN: We collected information about perceptions of oral contraceptive (OC) safety from 1271 women 18-49 years old in El Paso, TX, and compared their responses to a medical evaluation by a nurse practitioner. We also asked participants about their interest in obtaining OCs over the counter (OTC). RESULTS: Among 794 women potentially at risk of unintended pregnancy, 56.0% said that OCs were medically safe for them. Reasons given for OCs being unsafe were related to fears of side effects and prior negative experiences rather than true contraindications. Older women and participants recruited at the less affluent recruitment site were significantly more likely to report that OCs were medically unsafe for them (p<.05). Nonusers who thought OCs were medically unsafe for them were as likely to be medically eligible for use as current hormonal users. Among nonusers or nonhormonal users and potential OC candidates (n=601), 60.2% said they would be more likely to use OCs if they were available OTC. CONCLUSIONS: Women's perception of OC safety does not correlate well with medical eligibility for use. More education about the safety and health benefits of hormonal contraception is needed. OTC availability might contribute to more positive safety perceptions of OCs compared to a prescription environment. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Fear of side effects and previous negative experiences are common reasons for contraceptive nonuse. STUDY DESIGN: We collected information about perceptions of oral contraceptive (OC) safety from 1271 women 18-49 years old in El Paso, TX, and compared their responses to a medical evaluation by a nurse practitioner. We also asked participants about their interest in obtaining OCs over the counter (OTC). RESULTS: Among 794 women potentially at risk of unintended pregnancy, 56.0% said that OCs were medically safe for them. Reasons given for OCs being unsafe were related to fears of side effects and prior negative experiences rather than true contraindications. Older women and participants recruited at the less affluent recruitment site were significantly more likely to report that OCs were medically unsafe for them (p<.05). Nonusers who thought OCs were medically unsafe for them were as likely to be medically eligible for use as current hormonal users. Among nonusers or nonhormonal users and potential OC candidates (n=601), 60.2% said they would be more likely to use OCs if they were available OTC. CONCLUSIONS:Women's perception of OC safety does not correlate well with medical eligibility for use. More education about the safety and health benefits of hormonal contraception is needed. OTC availability might contribute to more positive safety perceptions of OCs compared to a prescription environment. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Lisa K Hansen; Polly Feigl; Manuel R Modiano; Jose A Lopez; Sylvia Escobedo Sluder; Carol M Moinpour; Donna K Pauler; Frank L Meyskens Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Jon Amastae; Michele Shedlin; Joseph E Potter Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Joseph E Potter; Sarah McKinnon; Kristine Hopkins; Jon Amastae; Michele G Shedlin; Daniel A Powers; Daniel Grossman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Joseph E Potter; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Sarah McKinnon; Michele G Shedlin; Jon Amastae; Daniel Grossman Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2012-10-11
Authors: Daniel Grossman; Kate Grindlay; Rick Li; Joseph E Potter; James Trussell; Kelly Blanchard Journal: Contraception Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Natalie D Hernandez; Rasheeta Chandler; Nancy Nava; Ilyssa Tamler; Ellen M Daley; Julie A Baldwin; Eric R Buhi; Kathleen O'Rourke; Nancy Romero-Daza; Stephanie Grilo Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2019-08-06
Authors: Hanna Xu; David L Eisenberg; Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-11-16 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Maysoon S Aladham; Hafiza Turkistany; Nazish Masud; Faisal O Alaqeel; Rawan H Alharbi; Lujain H Aljbli; Arwa A Alharisi; May M Alotaibie; Aryaf M Almotairi; Alanoud H Alassaf Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2020-12-31
Authors: Christian Egarter; Brigitte Frey Tirri; Johannes Bitzer; Vyacheslav Kaminskyy; Björn J Oddens; Vera Prilepskaya; Arie Yeshaya; Maya Marintcheva-Petrova; Steven Weyers Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 2.809