Literature DB >> 20159121

Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada.

Laura Dickey1, Aura Kagan, M Patrice Lindsay, Jiming Fang, Alexandra Rowland, Sandra Black.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence rate of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada, and to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics for stroke patients with and without aphasia.
DESIGN: Age- and sex-specific incidence rates for aphasia in Ontario were calculated using the Ontario Stroke Audit. In addition, data collected from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN) were used to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics for stroke patients with and without aphasia.
SETTING: All hospitals and regional stroke centers in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: The Ontario Stroke Audit is a representative weighted sample of more than 3000 stroke inpatients admitted to emergency departments in all hospitals in Ontario within the 2004/2005 fiscal year. RCSN data included a cohort of more than 15,000 consecutive patients presenting with stroke at 12 regional stroke centers in Ontario from 2003 to 2007.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of aphasic symptoms on admission to hospital and at discharge, age and sex, stroke type and severity, severity of disability, services received in hospital, length of stay, and discharge destination.
RESULTS: Thirty-five percent (1131/3207) of adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of stroke in the province of Ontario during the 2004 to 2005 Ontario Stroke Audit had symptoms of aphasia at the time of discharge. This amounts to an incidence rate of 60 per 100,000 persons per year. Risk of aphasia increased significantly with age. In comparison with nonaphasic stroke patients, patients with aphasia were older, presented with more severe strokes on admission, had more severe disability, and were more frequently discharged to long-term care and/or rehabilitation (unadjusted results). Adjusting for stroke severity, age, sex, comorbidity, and stroke subtype, the presence of aphasia was found to be an independent predictor of longer hospital stays, increased use of rehabilitation services, and higher rates of thrombolytic therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of people with stroke experience aphasia, with advancing age associated with a higher risk. The profile and patterns for stroke patients with aphasia differed significantly from those who did not experience aphasia as a residual disability after stroke, particularly in relation to service usage. Given the personal and system cost associated with aphasia, best practices in the area of stroke should include recommendations on how to best serve this population throughout the clinical pathway. Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20159121     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  42 in total

Review 1.  Intensity of aphasia therapy: evidence and efficacy.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Janet P Patterson; Anastasia M Raymer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Thinking About Better Speech: Mental Practice for Stroke-Induced Motor Speech Impairments.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Stacy Harnish
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 3.  Brain Stimulation and the Role of the Right Hemisphere in Aphasia Recovery.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Validation of a case definition for speech and language disorders: In community-dwelling older adults in Alberta.

Authors:  Rebecca Miyagishima; Neil Drummond; Linda Carroll; Tammy Hopper; Stephanie Garies; Tyler Williamson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Role of aphasia in discharge location after stroke.

Authors:  Marlís González-Fernández; Asare B Christian; Cameron Davis; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Developing complex interventions: lessons learned from a pilot study examining strategy training in acute stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Skidmore; Deirdre R Dawson; Ellen M Whyte; Meryl A Butters; Mary Amanda Dew; Emily S Grattan; James T Becker; Margo B Holm
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.477

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-21

8.  Clinical Implementation of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Aphasia: A Survey of Speech-Language Pathologists.

Authors:  Lynsey M Keator; Alexandra Basilakos; Christopher Rorden; Jordan Elm; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Access and Participation in Community-Based Exercise Programmes from the Perspective of Adults with Post-stroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Diane C Blonski; Megan Covert; Roxanne Gauthier; Alanna Monas; Danielle Murray; Kelly K O'Brien; Anita Debbie Mendelson; Maria Huijbregts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and aphasia: the case of mr. C.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Edna M Babbitt; Rosalind Hurwitz; Lynn M Rogers; James Stinear; Xue Wang; Richard L Harvey; Todd Parrish
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.