Literature DB >> 20158927

Predation by beetles (Carabidae, Staphylinidae) on eggs and juveniles of the Iberian slug Arion lusitanicus in the laboratory.

B A Hatteland1, K Grutle, C E Mong, J Skartveit, W O C Symondson, T Solhøy.   

Abstract

Arion lusitanicus has become a major pest species in western Norway in the last few years. This species originates from southern Europe but has been spread by humans over large parts of central and northern Europe during recent decades. Slugs have traditionally been controlled by the use of molluscicides; but, as these may have serious ecological side effects, biological control of slugs is highly desirable. Potential biological control agents include nematodes, gastropods and arthropods. In laboratory experiments, we tested whether five common predator beetles would feed on eggs and juveniles of A. lusitanicus. The species Carabus nemoralis, Nebria brevicollis, Pterostichus melanarius and Pterostichus niger (Carabidae) as well as Staphylinus erythropterus (Staphylinidae) were tested, of which only P. melanarius has been tested on A. lusitanicus previously. Nebria brevicollis did not feed on slug eggs or newly hatched slugs, but the remaining four species all killed and ate a large proportion of the eggs and hatchlings offered. Both P. melanarius and P. niger also destroyed A. lusitanicus eggs and hatchlings under conditions emulating those in the field. Prey size choice experiments were conducted by feeding C. nemoralis, P. niger and S. erythropterus on different sizes of A. lusitanicus. Carabus nemoralis was also given a choice between two slug species, A. lusitanicus and Deroceras reticulatum. A significant preference for slugs smaller than one gram was evident for C. nemoralis, while the other beetles struggled much more to overcome the mucus of juvenile slugs. No significant preference was found between A. lusitanicus and D. reticulatum as prey for C. nemoralis. We also discuss the feasibility of biological control of A. lusitanicus using beetle predators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20158927     DOI: 10.1017/S0007485309990629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Entomol Res        ISSN: 0007-4853            Impact factor:   1.750


  5 in total

1.  Plant species effects on soil macrofauna density in grassy arable fallows of different age.

Authors:  Jörg-Alfred Salamon; Janet Wissuwa; Stephan Jagos; Monika Koblmüller; Oxana Ozinger; Christine Winkler; Thomas Frank
Journal:  Eur J Soil Biol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.846

2.  Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.

Authors:  Alice Charalabidis; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Sandrine Petit; David A Bohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Spatiotemporal analysis of predation by carabid beetles (Carabidae) on nematode infected and uninfected slugs in the field.

Authors:  Bjørn Arild Hatteland; Solveig Haukeland; Steffen Roth; May Bente Brurberg; Ian P Vaughan; William O C Symondson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Chemical compounds related to the predation risk posed by malacophagous ground beetles alter self-maintenance behavior of naive slugs (Deroceras reticulatum).

Authors:  Piotr Bursztyka; Dominique Saffray; Céline Lafont-Lecuelle; Antoine Brin; Patrick Pageat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Functional Response and Predation Potential of Carabus elysii Adults against the Terrestrial Slug Agriolimax agrestis.

Authors:  Lin Jiang; Runa Zhao; Hui Tian; Xuesan Wu; Feng Guo; Wenlong Chen
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.769

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.