Literature DB >> 20158376

Racial disparities in stroke functional outcomes upon discharge from inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Koen Putman1, Susan Horn, Randall Smout, Gerben Dejong, Daniel Deutscher, Wenqiang Tian, Ching-Hui Hsieh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Analyse racial disparities in clinical outcomes after stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF).
METHODS: Analyses based on data from a multi-center prospective observational cohort study on inpatient stroke rehabilitation in six IRFs from across the United States. Multivariate models examined racial disparities in functional outcomes upon discharge, taking into account patient characteristics and detailed information on processes of care.
RESULTS: In the moderate stroke group (N = 397), functional scores on admission were not significantly different between African-Americans and whites. In the severe stroke group (N = 335), whites showed significantly lower functional scores at admission [Functional Independence Measurement, (FIM)], mean scores, 44 versus 49 for African-Americans, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses predicting discharge motor FIM score found no significant differences between African-American and white stroke patients (p = 0.2194 and p = 0.3547 in the moderate and severe stroke group, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Controlling for patient characteristics, therapy intensity and processes of care results in non-significant differences between African-Americans and whites in motor FIM scores upon discharge. The absence of significant differences in recovery while patients were on the rehabilitation unit suggests that racial disparities in long-term functional recovery after stroke are likely to have originated before or after the inpatient rehabilitation stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20158376     DOI: 10.3109/09638281003611078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  7 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in stroke outcomes: a scoping review of post-stroke disability assessment tools.

Authors:  Suzanne Perea Burns; Brandi M White; Gayenell Magwood; Charles Ellis; Ayaba Logan; Joy N Jones Buie; Robert J Adams
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Improving quality in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nizar Dowla; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

3.  Disparity in rehabilitation: another inconvenient truth.

Authors:  Kenneth M Jaffe; Nathalia Jimenez
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Factors Associated with Duration of Rehabilitation Among Older Adults with Prolonged Hospitalization.

Authors:  Danh Q Nguyen; Nneka L Ifejika; Timothy A Reistetter; Anil N Makam
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 7.538

Review 5.  Racial/Ethnic differences in poststroke rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Charles Ellis; Hyacinth I Hyacinth; Jamie Beckett; Wuwei Feng; Marc Chimowitz; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dan Lackland; Robert Adams
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2014-06-15

6.  Disparities in postacute rehabilitation care for stroke: an analysis of the state inpatient databases.

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Li-Jung E Ku; Malcolm P Cutchin; Kendra Heatwole-Shank; Lloyd J Edwards
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Assessment of the effects of rehabilitation after cerebrovascular accident in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension as risk factors.

Authors:  Edina Tanovic; Senad Selimovic; Haris Tanovic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.