The influence of TXNDC5 gene on gastric cancer cell.

BACKGROUND: TXNDC5 (thioredoxin domain containing 5) is over-expressed in tumors of the cervix, uterus, stomach and lung. However, not much is known about the functional roles of TXNDC5 gene in gastric adenocarcinoma. In the present study, we intend to investigate the effects of TXNDC5 on the growth, proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and cell cycle of the gastric cancer cell line MKN45 and normal gastric cell line HFE145.
METHODS: TXNDC5 cDNA was inserted into a constitutive vector pcDNA3.1 followed by transfection into normal gastric cell line HFE145 using liposome. Then, stable transfectants were selected and appraised. Specific silencing of TXNDC5 gene was achieved using a vector-based short interference RNAs (siRNA) system in gastric cancer cell line MKN45. The growth and proliferation were analyzed by cell growth curves and colony-forming assay, respectively. The apoptosis and cell cycles of these clones were analyzed using flow cytometry. The invasion of these cells was analyzed by cell migration assay. The TXNDC5 stable expression cell lines (HFE-TXNDC5) and TXNDC5 RNAi cell lines (MKN-SR1,2) were detected and compared with their control groups, respectively.
RESULTS: HFE-TXNDC5 grew faster than HFE145 and HFE-PC(HFE145 transfected with pcDNA3.1 vector). MKN-SR1 grew slower than MKN45 and MKN-SS1,2 (MKN45 transfected with scrambled control duplexes). The cell counts of HFE-TXNDC5 in the fifth, sixth and seventh days were significantly higher than those of control groups (P < 0.05). The cell counts of MKN-SR1 in the fifth, sixth and seventh days were significantly lower than those of control groups (P < 0.05). Cell cycle analysis showed that there were significant differences in proportions of G0-G1 and G2-M phase between HFE-TXNDC5, MKN-SR1 cells and their control groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The apoptosis rate of HFE-TXNDC5 was significantly lower than that of control groups (P < 0.05). The results of colony-forming assay showed that the colony formation rate of HFE-TXNDC5 was higher than those of control groups, otherwise the rate of MKN-SR1 were lower than those of their control groups (P < 0.05). The results of cell migration assay showed that the migration rate of HFE-TXNDC5 were significantly higher than that of its control group. Conversely, the migration rate of MKN-SR1 was significantly lower than that of its control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: TXNDC5 can promote the growth and proliferation of gastric cells. Silencing of TXNDC5 can restrain the growth and proliferation of gastric cancer cells. The gene can enhance the capability of invasion of gastric cancer cells. In some respects, TXNDC5 could be thought as a tumor-enhancing gene in gastric cancer.