Literature DB >> 20157572

It's all about balance: p53 and aging.

Benoit Biteau1, Heinrich Jasper.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; aging; antagonistic pleiotropy; p53; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20157572      PMCID: PMC2815742          DOI: 10.18632/aging.100102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


× No keyword cloud information.
New studies assessing whether the p53 tumor suppressor influences lifespan in flies highlight the complexities inherent in modulating the activity of this potent and versatile transcriptional regulator. Promoting efficient regeneration while preventing cancer is critical for tissue homeostasis. Genes and processes that influence the balance between regeneration and cancer are thus likely to affect lifespan of metazoans. Supporting this view, the tumor suppressor p53 has been found to strongly influence aging in mice. Interestingly, the lifespan consequences of increasing or decreasing p53 activity in mice are complex [1-5]. It is no surprise that loss of p53 leads to increased cancer incidence, and thus shorter lifespan [2]. Yet increasing p53 activity can have pleiotropic consequences: such interventions generally prevent cancer, increasing lifespan in some cases, but can also cause accelerated aging in others [6-11]. The discrepancy between lifespan shortening and lifespan extending consequences of p53 gain-of-function conditions has been attributed to differences in regulation of the corresponding transgenes, and highlights the complex and dose-dependent effects that such a versatile regulator of cell proliferation, repair and death can have on health span and aging [2]. The exact reasons for the pleiotropic effects of p53 on aging, however, remain elusive. Aging studies in less complex model organisms mightbe expected to contribute important insights into this puzzle. New studies by the Tower and Helfand labs assess the consequences of modulating p53 activity for the lifespan of flies, and shed light on the complexities of p53 function in even such relatively simple organisms [12-15]. In an exhaustive analysis of the lifespan effects of p53 gain- and loss-of-function conditions, Waskar and colleagues find strikingly pleiotropic effects resulting from ubiquitous increase or decrease of wild type p53 function [12]. Importantly, the consequences of modulating p53 are found to be tissue-, stage- and sex-specific: ubiquitous over-expression of p53 in adults shortens lifespan in females but slightly increases lifespan in males [12], whereas neuronal expression of the same construct extends lifespan in females and decreases life span in males [13]. Over-expressing p53 in larval stages, on the other hand, is sufficient to extend adult lifespan in both sexes, but in a dose-dependent manner, where strong expression is deleterious for lifespan, while moderate to weak over-expression increases lifespan [12]. The authors further examine the lifespan of a battery of mutants in which the endogenous p53 gene is disrupted, and find robust increase of lifespan in females, but context-dependent effects in males [12]. Confirming earlier studies by the Helfand lab, which demonstrated lifespan extension when dominant-negative p53 is expressed in neurons [16-18], Waskar and colleagues find that ubiquitous expression of a dominant negative form of p53 extends lifespan moderately in females [12]. The pleiotropic and sex-specific effects of modulating p53 activity in adults are likely caused by specific functions of this tumor suppressor in particular bio-logical processes. It is tempting to speculate that p53 might act to compromise or maintain the function of various tissues and processes in specific ways, thus causing antagonistic effects on overall lifespan. For example, (i) p53 is expressed in the female germline [19,20], and modulating p53 expression in this tissue is likely to affect its function. The ablation of germline stem cells has recently been shown to cause robust lifespan extension in Drosophila[21], suggesting that the effects of ubiquitous over-expression of p53 might in part be mediated by p53 function in this tissue. (ii) expression of p53 in intestinal stem cells (ISCs) leads to cell loss and strongly impairs gut regeneration [22]. Interestingly, probably due to a higher nutrient demand, intestinal tissue turnover is faster in females than in males [22]. As a consequence, p53-induced loss of ISCs would negatively affect female lifespan preferentially, counteracting the beneficial effects of neuronal expression or reduced germline function. (iii) the regulation of insulin-like peptide production by p53 (described by [16] is likely to influence tissue function systemically and thus further complicate the effects of p53 on lifespan. Accordingly, Foxo modulates the sex-specific lifespan consequences of p53 over-expression [13]. (iv) the lifespan extending effects of a dominant mutant p53 transgene were not additive with Sir2 over-expression or dietary restriction (DR) [14,15], and the life span extension due to wild-type p53 over-expression was dependent upon Sir2 function [13], indicating that tissue-specific interactions between these proteins might control metabolic homeostasis, further complicating the lifespan effects of modulating p53 activity. The fly offers unique tools to start testing these hypotheses, and it can thus be expected that the tissue-specific functions of p53, and the relative contribution of these functions to overall lifespan will be further explored in the near future. Such studies are expected to help obtaining a comprehensive view of the effects of p53 on tissue homeostasis, metabolic control, and other physiological processes that influence aging.
  22 in total

1.  Modulation of mammalian life span by the short isoform of p53.

Authors:  Bernhard Maier; Wendy Gluba; Brian Bernier; Terry Turner; Khalid Mohammad; Theresa Guise; Ann Sutherland; Michael Thorner; Heidi Scrable
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Tumor suppression and normal aging in mice with constitutively high p53 activity.

Authors:  Susan M Mendrysa; Kathleen A O'Leary; Matthew K McElwee; Jennifer Michalowski; Robert N Eisenman; Douglas A Powell; Mary Ellen Perry
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Neuronal expression of p53 dominant-negative proteins in adult Drosophila melanogaster extends life span.

Authors:  Johannes H Bauer; Peter C Poon; Heather Glatt-Deeley; John M Abrams; Stephen L Helfand
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  "Super p53" mice exhibit enhanced DNA damage response, are tumor resistant and age normally.

Authors:  Isabel García-Cao; Marta García-Cao; Juan Martín-Caballero; Luis M Criado; Peter Klatt; Juana M Flores; Jean-Claude Weill; María A Blasco; Manuel Serrano
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Cancer and ageing: convergent and divergent mechanisms.

Authors:  Manuel Serrano; Maria A Blasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Expression of dominant-negative Dmp53 in the adult fly brain inhibits insulin signaling.

Authors:  Johannes H Bauer; Chengyi Chang; Siti Nur Sarah Morris; Suzanne Hozier; Sandra Andersen; Joshua S Waitzman; Stephen L Helfand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Delayed ageing through damage protection by the Arf/p53 pathway.

Authors:  Ander Matheu; Antonio Maraver; Peter Klatt; Ignacio Flores; Isabel Garcia-Cao; Consuelo Borras; Juana M Flores; Jose Viña; Maria A Blasco; Manuel Serrano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  New tricks of an old molecule: lifespan regulation by p53.

Authors:  Johannes H Bauer; Stephen L Helfand
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.304

9.  Drosophila germ-line modulation of insulin signaling and lifespan.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt; Kyung-Jin Min; Cecilia D'Alterio; Eugenia Villa-Cuesta; John Cumbers; Ruth Lehmann; D Leanne Jones; Marc Tatar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease.

Authors:  Venkateswara R Chintapalli; Jing Wang; Julian A T Dow
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  6 in total

1.  Drosophila p53 isoforms differentially regulate apoptosis and apoptosis-induced proliferation.

Authors:  M-L Dichtel-Danjoy; D Ma; P Dourlen; G Chatelain; F Napoletano; M Robin; M Corbet; C Levet; H Hafsi; P Hainaut; H D Ryoo; J-C Bourdon; B Mollereau
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  Regulation of Drosophila lifespan by JNK signaling.

Authors:  Benoit Biteau; Jason Karpac; Daesung Hwangbo; Heinrich Jasper
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.032

3.  Melatonin and tumeric ameliorate aging-induced changes: implication of immunoglobulins, cytokines, DJ-1/NRF2 and apoptosis regulation.

Authors:  Ismail Ahmed Ismail; Hanan A El-Bakry; Safaa S Soliman
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-20

4.  The choice between p53-induced senescence and quiescence is determined in part by the mTOR pathway.

Authors:  Lioubov G Korotchkina; Olga V Leontieva; Elena I Bukreeva; Zoya N Demidenko; Andrei V Gudkov; Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Hormesis does not make sense except in the light of TOR-driven aging.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.682

6.  Circulatory miR34a as an RNAbased, noninvasive biomarker for brain aging.

Authors:  Xiaoli Li; Amit Khanna; Na Li; Eugenia Wang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.