BACKGROUND: The natural history of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in older women is critical for preventive strategies, including vaccination and screening intervals, but is poorly understood. In a 7-year population-based cohort study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica, we examined whether women's age and the duration of carcinogenic HPV infections influenced subsequent persistence of infection and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN 2) or worse disease. METHODS: At enrollment, of the 9466 participants eligible for pelvic examination, 9175 were screened for cervical neoplasia using multiple methods; those with CIN 2 or worse disease were censored and treated. Participants at low risk of CIN 2 or worse (n = 6029) were rescreened at 5-7 years (passively followed), whereas higher-risk participants (n = 2115) and subsets of low-risk women (n = 540) and initially sexually inactive women (n = 410) were rescreened annually or semiannually (actively followed) for up to 7 years. HPV testing was done using a polymerase chain reaction-based method. We determined, by four age groups (18-25, 26-33, 34-41, and > or =42 years), the proportion of prevalent infections (found at baseline) and newly detected infections (first found during follow-up) that persisted at successive 1-year time points and calculated absolute risks of CIN 2 and CIN grade 3 (CIN 3) or worse during follow-up. P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Regardless of the woman's age, newly detected infections were associated with very low absolute risks of persistence, CIN 2, or worse disease. For newly detected infections, the rate of progression to CIN 2+ (or CIN 3+), after 3 years of follow-up, was not higher for women aged 34 years and older than for younger women. Moreover, rates of newly detected infections declined sharply with age (in the actively followed group, at ages 18-25, 26-33, 34-41, and > or =42 years, rates were 35.9%, 30.6%, 18.1%, and 13.5%, respectively; P < .001). Among prevalent infections, persistent infections among older women (> or =42 years) was higher than that among younger age groups or new infections at any age (P < .01 for comparison of eight groups). Most (66 of 85) CIN 2 or worse detected during follow-up was associated with prevalent infections. Only a small subset (25 of 1128) of prevalent infections persisted throughout follow-up without apparent CIN 2 or worse. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of new infections declines with age, and new infections typically do not progress to CIN 2 or worse disease in older women; thus, overall potential benefit of prophylactic vaccination or frequent HPV screening to prevent or detect new carcinogenic HPV infections at older ages is low.
BACKGROUND: The natural history of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in older women is critical for preventive strategies, including vaccination and screening intervals, but is poorly understood. In a 7-year population-based cohort study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica, we examined whether women's age and the duration of carcinogenic HPV infections influenced subsequent persistence of infection and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN 2) or worse disease. METHODS: At enrollment, of the 9466 participants eligible for pelvic examination, 9175 were screened for cervical neoplasia using multiple methods; those with CIN 2 or worse disease were censored and treated. Participants at low risk of CIN 2 or worse (n = 6029) were rescreened at 5-7 years (passively followed), whereas higher-risk participants (n = 2115) and subsets of low-risk women (n = 540) and initially sexually inactive women (n = 410) were rescreened annually or semiannually (actively followed) for up to 7 years. HPV testing was done using a polymerase chain reaction-based method. We determined, by four age groups (18-25, 26-33, 34-41, and > or =42 years), the proportion of prevalent infections (found at baseline) and newly detected infections (first found during follow-up) that persisted at successive 1-year time points and calculated absolute risks of CIN 2 and CIN grade 3 (CIN 3) or worse during follow-up. P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Regardless of the woman's age, newly detected infections were associated with very low absolute risks of persistence, CIN 2, or worse disease. For newly detected infections, the rate of progression to CIN 2+ (or CIN 3+), after 3 years of follow-up, was not higher for women aged 34 years and older than for younger women. Moreover, rates of newly detected infections declined sharply with age (in the actively followed group, at ages 18-25, 26-33, 34-41, and > or =42 years, rates were 35.9%, 30.6%, 18.1%, and 13.5%, respectively; P < .001). Among prevalent infections, persistent infections among older women (> or =42 years) was higher than that among younger age groups or new infections at any age (P < .01 for comparison of eight groups). Most (66 of 85) CIN 2 or worse detected during follow-up was associated with prevalent infections. Only a small subset (25 of 1128) of prevalent infections persisted throughout follow-up without apparent CIN 2 or worse. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of new infections declines with age, and new infections typically do not progress to CIN 2 or worse disease in older women; thus, overall potential benefit of prophylactic vaccination or frequent HPV screening to prevent or detect new carcinogenic HPV infections at older ages is low.
Authors: Susanne Kjaer; Estrid Høgdall; Kirsten Frederiksen; Christian Munk; Adriaan van den Brule; Edith Svare; Chris Meijer; Attilla Lorincz; Thomas Iftner Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-10-23 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Silvia Franceschi; Rolando Herrero; Gary M Clifford; Peter J F Snijders; Annie Arslan; Pham Thi Hoang Anh; F Xavier Bosch; Catterina Ferreccio; Nguyen Trong Hieu; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Elena Matos; Monica Molano; You-Lin Qiao; Raj Rajkumar; Guglielmo Ronco; Silvia de Sanjosé; Hai-Rim Shin; Sukhon Sukvirach; Jaiye O Thomas; Chris J L M Meijer; Nubia Muñoz Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Rachel L Winer; Nancy B Kiviat; James P Hughes; Diane E Adam; Shu-Kuang Lee; Jane M Kuypers; Laura A Koutsky Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-01-21 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Rob Desalle; Allan Hildesheim; Sholom Wacholder; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Maria C Bratti; Mark E Sherman; Jorge Morales; Diego Guillen; Mario Alfaro; Martha Hutchinson; Thomas C Wright; Diane Solomon; Zigui Chen; John Schussler; Philip E Castle; Robert D Burk Journal: Virology Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; M Concepcion Bratti; Mark E Sherman; Sholom Wacholder; Robert Tarone; Robert D Burk Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-05-02 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Rolando Herrero; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; M Concepción Bratti; Allan Hildesheim; Jorge Morales; Mario Alfaro; Mark E Sherman; Sholom Wacholder; Sabrina Chen; Ana C Rodriguez; Robert D Burk Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-05-02 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Robert Burk; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Concepcion Bratti; Mark E Sherman; Diane Solomon; Diego Guillen; Mario Alfaro; Raphael Viscidi; Jorge Morales; Martha Hutchinson; Sholom Wacholder; Mark Schiffman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Michelle J Khan; Philip E Castle; Attila T Lorincz; Sholom Wacholder; Mark Sherman; David R Scott; Brenda B Rush; Andrew G Glass; Mark Schiffman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-07-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sarah Coseo Markt; Ana C Rodriguez; Robert D Burk; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; Sholom Wacholder; Martha Hutchinson; Mark Schiffman Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Sarah E Coseo; Carolina Porras; Lori E Dodd; Allan Hildesheim; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Sholom Wacholder; Paula Gonzalez; Mark E Sherman; Silvia Jimenez; Diane Solomon; Catherine Bougelet; Leen-Jan van Doorn; Wim Quint; Mahboobeh Safaeian Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Clara Bodelon; Svetlana Vinokurova; Joshua N Sampson; Johan A den Boon; Joan L Walker; Mark A Horswill; Keegan Korthauer; Mark Schiffman; Mark E Sherman; Rosemary E Zuna; Jason Mitchell; Xijun Zhang; Joseph F Boland; Anil K Chaturvedi; S Terence Dunn; Michael A Newton; Paul Ahlquist; Sophia S Wang; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Maura L Gillison; Tatevik Broutian; Robert K L Pickard; Zhen-you Tong; Weihong Xiao; Lisa Kahle; Barry I Graubard; Anil K Chaturvedi Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Van K Morris; Asif Rashid; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Prajnan Das; George Chang; Aki Ohinata; Jane Rogers; Christopher Crane; Robert A Wolff; Cathy Eng Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-09-17