Literature DB >> 20156668

Desflurane versus sevoflurane to reduce blood loss in maxillofacial surgery.

Alessandro Rossi1, Gabriele Falzetti, Abele Donati, Giovanni Orsetti, Paolo Pelaia.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In our study, desflurane was hypothesized to reduce blood loss more than sevoflurane, both used with targeted mild controlled hypotension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20 American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I patients undergoing maxillofacial elective surgery for maxillary and mandibular osteotomies were randomized to a desflurane group or a sevoflurane group. Anesthesia was performed with an end tidal value of the inhaled agent to obtain a bispectral index value <30 but without burst-suppression patterns (minimal alveolar concentration age-corrected between 0.7 and 0.9). Remifentanil was administered at a dose of 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) to obtain analgesia and a <2 surgical field level in Fromme's modified scale. Sodium-nitroprusside was administered on demand to have a surgical field level of <2 when the anesthesia plan was not sufficient to achieve this target. The minimal value of the mean arterial pressure achievable was 60 mm Hg.
RESULTS: In the desflurane group, blood loss was more restricted. The hypotensive drug was used in 8 patients in the sevoflurane group and 2 patients in the desflurane group.
CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia with desflurane can reduce blood loss and could give an acceptable surgical field with mild controlled hypotension and with a substantial reduction in the vasoactive drug requirement. These data need to be assessed with an enlargement of the statistical sample. Copyright 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20156668     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Patient Blood Management : three pillar strategy to improve outcome through avoidance of allogeneic blood products].

Authors:  H Gombotz; A Hofmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Immune Modulation by Volatile Anesthetics.

Authors:  Lindsay M Stollings; Li-Jie Jia; Pei Tang; Huanyu Dou; Binfeng Lu; Yan Xu
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Comparing the effects of desflurane and isoflurane on middle ear pressure.

Authors:  B Acar; S Degerli; S Sahin; R M Karasen
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 4.  Hypotensive anesthesia versus normotensive anesthesia during major maxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michal Barak; Leiser Yoav; Imad Abu el-Naaj
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-23

5.  Comparison of surgical conditions in 2 different anesthesia techniques of esmolol-induced controlled hypotension in breast reduction surgery.

Authors:  Ahmet Besir; Bahanur Cekic; Dilek Kutanis; Ali Akdogan; Murat Livaoglu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Remifentanil infusion during desflurane anesthesia reduces tissue blood flow while maintaining blood pressure and tissue oxygen tension in the masseter muscle and mandibular bone marrow.

Authors:  Ayaka Kobayashi; Masataka Kasahara; Kyotaro Koshika; Yui Akiike; Nobuyuki Matsuura; Tatsuya Ichinohe
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Is hypotensive anaesthesia guided by invasive intraarterial monitoring required for orthognathic surgery? - A retrospective review of anaesthetic practice and intraoperative blood loss in orthognathic surgery in a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Yi Lin Lee; Suhitharan Thangavelautham; Sudha Harikrishnan; Ranjith Karthekeyan; Harikrishnan Kothandan
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-07-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.