Literature DB >> 20156576

Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.

Daniel Güllmar1, Jens Haueisen, Jürgen R Reichenbach.   

Abstract

To investigate the influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter on the forward and inverse solution in electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) numerical simulation studies were performed. A high-resolution (1 mm3 isotropic) finite element model of a human head was implemented to study the sensitivity of EEG and MEG source localization. In vivo information on the anisotropy was obtained from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and included into the model, whereas both a direct transformation and a direct transformation with volume normalization were used to obtain conductivity tensors. Additionally, fixed artificial anisotropy ratios were also used, while considering only the orientation information from DTI, to generate conductivity tensors. Analysis was performed using over 25,000 single dipolar sources covering the full neocortex. Major findings of the study include that EEG is more sensitive to anisotropic conductivities in white matter compared to MEG. Especially with the inverse analysis, we found that sources placed deep in sulci are located more laterally if anisotropic conductivity of white matter tissue is neglected. Overall, the single-source localization errors resulting from a neglect of anisotropy were found to be smaller compared to errors associated with other modeling errors, like misclassified tissue or the use of nonrealistic head models. In contrast to the small localization error we observed significant changes in magnitude and orientation. The latter is important since dipole orientation might be more important than absolute dipole localization in assigning, e.g., epileptic activity to the wall of the affected brain sulcal area. If high-resolution finite element models are used to perform source localization in EEG and MEG experiments and the quality of the measured data permits localization accuracy of 1 mm and below, the influence of anisotropic compartments has to be taken into account. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20156576     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  50 in total

1.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models.

Authors:  Mirko Windhoff; Alexander Opitz; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for postoperative deep brain stimulation targeting of subthalamic nucleus pathways.

Authors:  Edgar Peña; Simeng Zhang; Remi Patriat; Joshua E Aman; Jerrold L Vitek; Noam Harel; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Comparison of procedures for co-registering scalp-recording locations to anatomical magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Antonio M Chiarelli; Edward L Maclin; Kathy A Low; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  A retrospective evaluation of automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Brock; Daria N Anderson; John D Rolston; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging.

Authors:  Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  A review of anisotropic conductivity models of brain white matter based on diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Zhanxiong Wu; Yang Liu; Ming Hong; Xiaohui Yu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Neurocognitive Effects of Combined Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Venlafaxine in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE Study.

Authors:  Sarah H Lisanby; Shawn M McClintock; George Alexopoulos; Samuel H Bailine; Elisabeth Bernhardt; Mimi C Briggs; C Munro Cullum; Zhi-De Deng; Mary Dooley; Emma T Geduldig; Robert M Greenberg; Mustafa M Husain; Styliani Kaliora; Rebecca G Knapp; Vassilios Latoussakis; Lauren S Liebman; William V McCall; Martina Mueller; Georgios Petrides; Joan Prudic; Peter B Rosenquist; Matthew V Rudorfer; Shirlene Sampson; Abeba A Teklehaimanot; Kristen G Tobias; Richard D Weiner; Robert C Young; Charles H Kellner
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.105

8.  Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Danielle D Sliva; Myong-sun Choe; P Ellen Grant; Yoshio Okada; Carsten H Wolters; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.