Literature DB >> 20156543

Evaluation of implantable actuators by means of a middle ear simulation model.

Matthias Bornitz1, Hans-Jürgen Hardtke, Thomas Zahnert.   

Abstract

The extension of indication of implantable hearing aids to cases of conductive hearing loss pushed the development of these devices. There is now a great variety of devices available with different actuator concepts and different attachment points to the middle ear or inner ear fluid. But there is little comparative data available about the devices to provide an insight into advantages and disadvantages of different types of actuators and attachment points at the ossicular chain. This paper investigates two principle (idealized) types of actuators in respect of attachments points at the ossicular chain and direction of excitation. Other parts of implantable hearing aids like microphone, amplifier and signal processing electronics were not incorporated into this study. Investigations were performed by means of a mathematical simulation model of the middle ear (finite element model). Actuator performance and theoretical gain were calculated by harmonic analysis in the frequency range of 100-6000 Hz and were compared for the different situations. The stapes head proofed to be an ideal attachment point for actuators of both types as this position is very insensitive to changes in the direction of excitation. The implantable actuators showed higher ratio of equivalent sound pressure to radiated sound pressure compared to an open hearing aid transducer and should therefore allow for more functional gain. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20156543     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Coupling of active middle ear implants-biomechanical aspects].

Authors:  M Bornitz; N Lasurashvili; M Neudert; T Beleites; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [The Vibrant Soundbridge as an active implant in middle ear surgery].

Authors:  T Beleites; M Bornitz; M Neudert; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Design and optimization of auditory prostheses using the finite element method: a narrative review.

Authors:  Qianli Cheng; Han Yu; Junpei Liu; Qi Zheng; Yanru Bai; Guangjian Ni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

Review 4.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss compared to a matched population with conventional hearing aids.

Authors:  Friedrich Ihler; Julian Bewarder; Jenny Blum; Christoph Matthias; Martin Canis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The Influence of Piezoelectric Transducer Stimulating Sites on the Performance of Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Devices: A Numerical Analysis.

Authors:  Houguang Liu; Yu Zhao; Jianhua Yang; Zhushi Rao
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Evaluation of Vibrant® Soundbridge™ positioning and results with laser doppler vibrometry and the finite element model.

Authors:  Horia Mocanu; Matthias Bornitz; Nicoloz Lasurashvili; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Examination of a mechanical amplifier in the incudostapedial joint gap: FEM simulation and physical model.

Authors:  Martin Koch; Till Moritz Eßinger; Matthias Bornitz; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.