Literature DB >> 20155755

A retrospective study by oligonucleotide array-CGH analysis in 50 fetuses with multiple malformations.

M Valduga1, C Philippe, P Bach Segura, O Thiebaugeorges, A Miton, M Beri, C Bonnet, C Nemos, B Foliguet, P Jonveaux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively define the frequency and the nature of submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances among fetuses with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA).
METHODS: We used oligonucleotide arrays to perform comparative genomic hybridization after termination of pregnancy in 50 polymalformated fetuses with a normal karyotype. These fetuses presented with at least three significant malformations (42 cases) or a severe brain anomaly (eight cases).
RESULTS: We identified a deleterious copy number variation (CNV) in five fetuses (10%). De novo genomic imbalances identified in this study consisted of a 6qter deletion in a fetus with brain and renal malformations, a mosaicism for a 8p tetrasomy in a fetus with agenesis of corpus callosum, growth retardation, mild facial dysmorphic features, and vertebral anomalies, a 17p13.3 deletion in a fetus with a complex brain malformation, and a partial 11p trisomy in a fetus with severe growth retardation and oligoamnios. In one case, we identified a partial 17q trisomy resulting from malsegregation of a cryptic-balanced translocation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is particularly effective for identifying the molecular basis of the disease phenotype in fetuses with multiple anomalies. Our study should help to define clinical relevant regions that would need to be included in targeted arrays designed for prenatal testing. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155755     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  20 in total

1.  Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow.

Authors:  Malgorzata Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Grétel Oudesluijs; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Govaerts; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Replication stress and mechanisms of CNV formation.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Thomas E Wilson; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  A de novo chromosomal abnormality in Cri du Chat syndrome.

Authors:  Shunchang C Sun; Fuwei W Luo; Zhiming M Zhou; Yunsheng S Peng; Huiwen W Song
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns.

Authors:  Curtis R Coughlin; Gunter H Scharer; Tamim H Shaikh
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  Genomic SNP array as a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of foetal ultrasound abnormalities.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Gretel O Oudesluijs; Titia Cohen-Overbeek; Lutgarde Cp Govaerts; Karin Em Diderich; Renske Oegema; Maarten Fcm Knapen; Ingrid Mbh van de Laar; Marieke Joosten; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations.

Authors:  Paola Evangelidou; Carolina Sismani; Marios Ioannides; Christodoulos Christodoulou; George Koumbaris; Ioannis Kallikas; Ioannis Georgiou; Voula Velissariou; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Comparable low-level mosaicism in affected and non affected tissue of a complex CDH patient.

Authors:  Danielle Veenma; Niels Beurskens; Hannie Douben; Bert Eussen; Petra Noomen; Lutgarde Govaerts; Els Grijseels; Maarten Lequin; Ronald de Krijger; Dick Tibboel; Annelies de Klein; Dian Van Opstal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Jill A Rosenfeld; Mindy P Dabell; Justine Coppinger; Anne M Bandholz; Jay W Ellison; J Britt Ravnan; Beth S Torchia; Blake C Ballif; Allan J Fisher
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 9.  Implementation of high resolution whole genome array CGH in the prenatal clinical setting: advantages, challenges, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Paola Evangelidou; Angelos Alexandrou; Maria Moutafi; Marios Ioannides; Pavlos Antoniou; George Koumbaris; Ioannis Kallikas; Voula Velissariou; Carolina Sismani; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  An improved method to extract DNA from 1 ml of uncultured amniotic fluid from patients at less than 16 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Mosca-Boidron; Laurence Faivre; Serge Aho; Nathalie Marle; Caroline Truntzer; Thierry Rousseau; Clémence Ragon; Muriel Payet; Christelle Thauvin-Robinet; Julien Thevenon; Salima El Chehadeh; Fréderic Huet; Paul Sagot; Francine Mugneret; Patrick Callier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.