Literature DB >> 20155717

Maintaining vascular access: the management of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts.

A Frederick Schild1.   

Abstract

For the nephrologist and surgeon, maintaining vascular access is a significant challenge in hemodialysis (HD), because the portal is vulnerable to infection, stenosis, and thrombus. Vascular access options for HD include the placement of arteriovenous (AV) fistulas, AV grafts, and double-lumen, cuffed central vein catheters. Catheter use is generally associated with higher rates of infection and could compromise the adequacy of HD. Primary AV fistulas, which are generally recommended and provide excellent HD access, are not always the ideal choice for certain patients, such as the elderly or patients with diabetes mellitus. AV grafts allow for a large surface area available for cannulation, and thrombosed grafts have longer patency rates after revision than do revised fistulas. Although both AV fistulas and AV grafts are vulnerable to thrombosis and/or stenosis, surveillance and techniques such as Doppler ultrasound and intravascular ultrasound can minimize such complications. In addition, pharmacotherapeutic options are being studied to determine whether these complications can be prevented. Studies using a variety of pharmacologic agents have been conducted to determine whether stenosis and graft thrombosis can be prevented and have produced varying results. The use of warfarin can result in significant bleeding, but agents such as fish oil and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have shown some effect in increasing the patency in AV grafts and fistulas. Additional randomized trials with at least 1 or 2 yrs of follow-up are necessary to assess the long-term use of these pharmacotherapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155717     DOI: 10.1177/112972981001100202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Access        ISSN: 1129-7298            Impact factor:   2.283


  8 in total

1.  Effect of the time to intervention on the outcome of thrombosed dialysis access grafts managed percutaneously.

Authors:  John David Prologo; Gregory Minwell; Jillian Kent; Ali Pirasteh; David Corn
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Quality indicators of vascular access procedures for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Branko Fila
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Vascular access today.

Authors:  Konstantinos Pantelias; Eirini Grapsa
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-06

4.  Immediate access arteriovenous grafts versus tunnelled central venous catheters: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Emma Aitken; Colin Geddes; Pete Thomson; Ram Kasthuri; Mohan Chandramohan; Colin Berry; David Kingsmore
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Aortic Arch Calcification Predicts Patency Loss of Arteriovenous Fistula in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.

Authors:  Yit-Sheung Yap; Kai-Ting Ting; Wen-Che Chi; Cheng-Hao Lin; Yi-Chun Liu; Wan-Long Chuang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Aortic Arch Calcification as a Predictor of Repeated Arteriovenous Fistula Failure within 1-Year in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Yit-Sheung Yap; Kai-Ting Ting; Wen-Che Chi; Cheng-Hao Lin; Yi-Chun Liu; Po-Lin Kuo; Wan-Long Chuang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Retroperitoneal approach for lower extremity arteriovenous graft as long-term vascular access in a complex case.

Authors:  Mingli Zhu; Yaxue Shi; Jiejun Cheng; Huihua Pang; Leyi Gu; Aiwu Lin; Ying Huang; Yucheng Yan
Journal:  Case Rep Nephrol Urol       Date:  2012-07-04

Review 8.  Most important chronic complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Radojica Stolic
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 1.927

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.