Literature DB >> 20155510

Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary sinus sizes in different malocclusion classes.

Toshiya Endo1, Ryota Abe, Hiroo Kuroki, Koji Kojima, Kenji Oka, Shohachi Shimooka.   

Abstract

We found few studies on the association between maxillary sinus size and malocclusion in an electronic search using PubMed. The purpose of this study was to investigate maxillary sinus size in different malocclusion groups and the association between maxillary sinus size and dentofacial morphology by the use of lateral cephalometric radiographs. A total of 120 lateral cephalograms were used. These radiographs were derived from subjects with skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions, classified on the basis of the A-N-B angle. Each malocclusion group consisted of 20 boys and 20 girls ranging in age from 12 to 16 years. Two linear measurements and three area measurements were made to evaluate maxillary sinus size, and four angular and eight linear measurements were made to evaluate dentofacial morphology. Analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation analysis were performed for statistical comparison. The maxillary sinuses showed no significant differences in size between the different classes of skeletal malocclusion or between sexes. However, the maxillary sinus measurements were significantly correlated with several dentofacial morphological measurements. When formulating an orthodontic treatment plan, orthodontists should take into consideration the fact that the patients 12 to 16 years old with large cranial bases and nasomaxillary complexes tend to have larger maxillary sinuses, but there is no significant association between maxillary sinus size and the A-N-B angle denoting the sagittal skeletal jaw relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155510     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-009-0108-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  23 in total

1.  Paranasal sinuses in children: size evaluation of maxillary, sphenoid, and frontal sinuses by magnetic resonance imaging and proposal of volume index percentile curves.

Authors:  G Barghouth; J O Prior; D Lepori; B Duvoisin; P Schnyder; F Gudinchet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans.

Authors:  H H Kwak; H D Park; H R Yoon; M K Kang; K S Koh; H J Kim
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Evaluation of the implantation position of mini-screws for orthodontic treatment in the maxillary molar area by a micro CT.

Authors:  Takenobu Ishii; Kunihiko Nojima; Yasushi Nishii; Takashi Takaki; Hideharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Bull Tokyo Dent Coll       Date:  2004-08

4.  Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study.

Authors:  Mehmet Emirzeoglu; Bunyamin Sahin; Sait Bilgic; Mehmet Celebi; Ahmet Uzun
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 1.863

5.  Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.

Authors:  Chung-Chen Jane Yao; Eddie Hsiang-Hua Lai; Jenny Zwei-Chieng Chang; I Chen; Yi-Jane Chen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  The importance of the maxillary sinuses in facial development: a case report.

Authors:  E K Basdra; A Stellzig; G Komposch
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Morphological associations between the Angle classes.

Authors:  J M Dibbets
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method.

Authors:  A Björk
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 9.  Development of the paranasal sinuses in children: implications for paranasal sinus surgery.

Authors:  G Wolf; W Anderhuber; F Kuhn
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Rhinologic computed tomographic evaluation in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  H Suzuki; T Yamaguchi; M Furukawa
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-09
View more
  8 in total

1.  Maxillary sinus size and posterior tooth inclination in Japanese orthodontic patients with agenesis of maxillary second premolars.

Authors:  Yui Kabasawa; Yoshiko Seto-Sugiki; Toshiya Endo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Frontal sinus: is it a predictor for vertical malocclusions?

Authors:  Gamze Metin-Gürsoy; Gülsün Akay; Burcu Baloş Tuncer
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.741

3.  Maxillary sinus dimensions in skeletal class II population with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Abby Syverson; Chenshuang Li; Zhong Zheng; Evgenii Proskurnin; Chun-Hsi Chung; Min Zou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  'Comparison and correlation of the maxillary sinus dimensions in various craniofacial patterns: A CBCT Study'.

Authors:  Harshit Atul Kumar; U S Krishna Nayak; M N Kuttappa
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2022-05-03

5.  Three-Dimensional CBCT Based Evaluation of the Maxillary Sinus by Facial Index.

Authors:  Jeong-Hyun Lee; Jong-Tae Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  The effect of ectodermal dysplasia on volume and surface area of maxillary sinus.

Authors:  Eda Didem Yalcin; Mahmut Koparal; Orhan Aksoy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Alana Tavares; Iêda-Margarida Crusoé-Rebello; Frederico-Sampaio Neves
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-11-01

8.  Cephalometric association of mandibular size/length to the surface area and dimensions of the frontal and maxillary sinuses.

Authors:  Soghra Yassaei; Akramsadat Emami; Sanam Mirbeigi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.