Literature DB >> 20155332

Neuronal vs. glial fate of embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors (ES-NPs) is determined by FGF2/EGF during proliferation.

Rajendran Sanalkumar1, Sasidharan Vidyanand, Chandrasekharan Lalitha Indulekha, Jackson James.   

Abstract

Fate-specific differentiation of neural progenitors attracts keen interest in modern medicine due to its application in cell replacement therapy. Though various signaling pathways are involved in maintenance and differentiation of neural progenitors, the mechanism of development of lineage-restricted progenitors from embryonic stem (ES) cells is not clearly understood. Here, we have demonstrated that neuronal vs. glial differentiation potential of ES cell-derived neural progenitors (ES-NPs) are governed by the growth factors, exposed during their proliferation/expansion phase and cannot be significantly altered during differentiation phase. Exposure of ES-NPs to fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) during proliferation triggered the expression of pro-neural genes that are required for neuronal lineage commitment, and upon differentiation, predominantly generated neurons. On the other hand, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-exposed ES-NPs are not committed to neuronal fate due to decreased expression of pro-neural genes. These ES-NPs further generate more glial cells due to expression of glial-restricted factors. Exposure of ES-NPs to the same growth factors during proliferation/expansion and differentiation phase augments the robust differentiation of neurons or glial subtypes. We also demonstrate that, during differentiation, exposure to growth factors other than that in which the ES-NPs were expanded does not significantly alter the fate of ES-NPs. Thus, we conclude that FGF2 and EGF determine the neural vs. glial fate of ES-NPs during proliferation and augment it during differentiation. Further modification of these protocols would help in generating fate-specified neurons for various regenerative therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155332     DOI: 10.1007/s12031-010-9335-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Neurosci        ISSN: 0895-8696            Impact factor:   3.444


  45 in total

1.  Changes in cerebral cortex size are governed by fibroblast growth factor during embryogenesis

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2 have different effects on neural progenitors in the adult rat brain.

Authors:  H G Kuhn; J Winkler; G Kempermann; L J Thal; F H Gage
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Self-renewal vs. differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  K Sue O'Shea
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  ES cell-derived neuroepithelial cell cultures.

Authors:  Shreeya Karki; Jan Pruszak; Ole Isacson; Kai C Sonntag
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Neural bHLH genes control the neuronal versus glial fate decision in cortical progenitors.

Authors:  M Nieto; C Schuurmans; O Britz; F Guillemot
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A high concentration of epidermal growth factor increases the growth and survival of neurogenic radial glial cells within human neurosphere cultures.

Authors:  Aaron D Nelson; Masatoshi Suzuki; Clive N Svendsen
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro and after transplantation into eyes of mutant mice with rapid retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Jason S Meyer; Martin L Katz; Joel A Maruniak; Mark D Kirk
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: current progress and potential for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Giovanni Amabile; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.951

9.  Glial cell fate specification modulated by the bHLH gene Hes5 in mouse retina.

Authors:  M Hojo; T Ohtsuka; N Hashimoto; G Gradwohl; F Guillemot; R Kageyama
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Combinatorial actions of patterning and HLH transcription factors in the spatiotemporal control of neurogenesis and gliogenesis in the developing spinal cord.

Authors:  Michiya Sugimori; Motoshi Nagao; Nicolas Bertrand; Carlos M Parras; François Guillemot; Masato Nakafuku
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  8 in total

1.  Extremely low frequency magnetic field induces human neuronal differentiation through NMDA receptor activation.

Authors:  Alp Özgün; Ana Marote; Leo A Behie; António Salgado; Bora Garipcan
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Hes-1 regulates the excitatory fate of neural progenitors through modulation of Tlx3 (HOX11L2) expression.

Authors:  Chandrasekharan Lalitha Indulekha; Thulasi Sheela Divya; Mundackal Sivaraman Divya; Rajendran Sanalkumar; Vazhanthodi Abdul Rasheed; Sivadasan Bindu Dhanesh; Anu Sebin; Amitha George; Jackson James
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Modeling Huntington's disease with induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Julia A Kaye; Steven Finkbeiner
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.314

Review 4.  Stem cell models of Alzheimer's disease: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Charles Arber; Christopher Lovejoy; Selina Wray
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 6.982

5.  Aberrant iPSC-derived human astrocytes in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  V C Jones; R Atkinson-Dell; A Verkhratsky; L Mohamet
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 8.469

6.  Astrocyte pathology and the absence of non-cell autonomy in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of TDP-43 proteinopathy.

Authors:  Andrea Serio; Bilada Bilican; Sami J Barmada; Dale Michael Ando; Chen Zhao; Rick Siller; Karen Burr; Ghazal Haghi; David Story; Agnes Lumi Nishimura; Monica A Carrasco; Hemali P Phatnani; Carole Shum; Ian Wilmut; Tom Maniatis; Christopher E Shaw; Steven Finkbeiner; Siddharthan Chandran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Targeting Glioblastoma Stem Cells: A Review on Biomarkers, Signal Pathways and Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Xuejia Tang; Chenghai Zuo; Pengchao Fang; Guojing Liu; Yongyi Qiu; Yi Huang; Rongrui Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Glioma Stem Cells: Signaling, Microenvironment, and Therapy.

Authors:  Brandon D Liebelt; Takashi Shingu; Xin Zhou; Jiangong Ren; Seul A Shin; Jian Hu
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.443

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.