Literature DB >> 20155228

Degree of conversion and antimicrobial activity of etch-and-rinse versus self-etching adhesives.

Ibrahim M Hamouda1, Adel M Al-Khodary, Fahiem M El Shami.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the self-etching with the etch-and-rinse adhesives regarding the degree of conversion and antimicrobial activity against cariogenic bacteria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials used were AdheSE (two-step self-etching), Adper Prompt L-Pop (self-etching, single-step) and Excite (etch-and-rinse) adhesives. The degree of conversion was measured using Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectroscopy. The absorbance peaks of infrared rays by the aliphatic C=C was detected at 1632 to 1637cm-1 and the aromatic C=C peak at 1610 to 1500 cm-1.The antimicrobial activity was evaluated using the microorganisms Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus salivarius, and Actinomyces odontolyticus, with a disk diffusion method. Chlorhexidine digluconate solution 0.2% was used as a positive control. Zones of inhibited bacterial growth were observed and measured.
RESULTS: AdheSE showed the highest degree of conversion, followed by Excite, while Adper Prompt L-Pop had the lowest values. A significant difference in the degree of conversion was found between Excite and Adper Prompt L-Pop as well as AdheSE and Adper Prompt L-Pop. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between Excite and AdheSE. Adper Prompt L-Pop showed an antimicrobial effect against Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces odontolyticus while it was unable to inhibit the growth of Lactobacillus salivarius. AdheSE could inhibit the growth of Streptococcus mutans only. Excite did not produce inhibition zones to the tested microorganisms.
CONCLUSION: Adper Prompt L-Pop showed the worst degree of conversion. AdheSE and Excite had the highest degree of conversion. Appreciable antimicrobial activity was noted with self-etching adhesives, while the etch-and-rinse demonstrated no antimicrobial action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155228     DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a17535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adhes Dent        ISSN: 1461-5185            Impact factor:   2.359


  3 in total

1.  Influence of dentin and enamel pretreatment with acidic sulfur compounds on adhesive performance.

Authors:  Alexis Ioannidis; Bogna Stawarczyk; Beatrice Sener; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Analysis of interfacial structure and bond strength of self-etch adhesives.

Authors:  Lilliam M Pinzon; Larry G Watanabe; Andre F Reis; John M Powers; Sally J Marshall; Grayson W Marshall
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Antibacterial Activity of Commercial Dentine Bonding Systems against E. faecalis-Flow Cytometry Study.

Authors:  Monika Lukomska-Szymanska; Magdalena Konieczka; Beata Zarzycka; Barbara Lapinska; Janina Grzegorczyk; Jerzy Sokolowski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.623

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.