Literature DB >> 20154737

Attainment of at least a very good partial response after induction treatment is an important surrogate of longer survival for multiple myeloma.

D Tan1, Z Lao, Y Loh, H J Ng, C Chuah, G C Wong, M Koh, Y C Linn, L C Lim, S L Tien, L H Lee, Y T Goh, W Hwang.   

Abstract

The importance of achieving a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) after induction treatment of myeloma has traditionally only been discussed in the context of high-dose therapy with auto-SCT (HDT/auto-SCT). Of late, the advent of novel agents for induction treatment has resulted in improved CR and VGPR rates, which are comparable with those observed with HDT/auto-SCT. We show that in an unselected group of 179 myeloma patients with diverse baseline characteristics, and treated with different modern induction regimens within a single institution, the attainment of ≥VGPR with or without HDT/auto-ASCT represents a major surrogate marker of better clinical outcomes. On the basis of a 1-year landmark survival analysis, patients achieving ≥VGPR enjoy a significantly longer PFS, which translated to a longer OS. Superseding the adverse effects of advanced age, high International Staging System (ISS) stage, adverse cytogenetics and independent of the transplant status, the attainment of ≥VGPR emerged as the single most significant predictor of long-term survival on multivariate analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20154737     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  4 in total

1.  Reduction in plasma cell proliferation after initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma measures treatment response and predicts improved survival.

Authors:  Jeremy T Larsen; Cheng E Chee; John A Lust; Philip R Greipp; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The Singapore Myeloma Study Group Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sanjay de Mel; Yunxin Chen; Sathish Kumar Gopalakrishnan; Melissa Ooi; Constance Teo; Daryl Tan; Min Li Claire Teo; Allison Cy Tso; Lian King Lee; Chandramouli Nagarajan; Yeow Tee Goh; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Outcome of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Lauren W Veltri; Denái R Milton; Ruby Delgado; Nina Shah; Krina Patel; Yago Nieto; Partow Kebriaei; Uday R Popat; Simrit Parmar; Betul Oran; Stefan Ciurea; Chitra Hosing; Hans C Lee; Elisabet Manasanch; Robert Z Orlowski; Elizabeth J Shpall; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Qaiser Bashir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Efficacy of a referral center for patient-centered care in multiple myeloma: a cohort study.

Authors:  Indara C Saccilotto; Rosane Isabel Bittencourt; Camila C Fischer; Amanda Quevedo; Vania N Hirakata; Paulo D Picon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.