Literature DB >> 2015449

Adversity in groups with an increased risk of minor affective disorder.

P E Bebbington, C Tennant, J Hurry.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that the sociodemographic distribution of minor affective disorder can be explained by high-risk groups experiencing more psychosocial stress, defined in terms of life events and chronic difficulties, was tested. Linear logistic analysis of data from 275 subjects identified in a community psychiatric survey provided little support for this. Although high-risk groups uniformly experienced more psychosocial adversity, and adversity was strongly associated with disorder, this did not provide an adequate explanation for the increased risk of disorder. This must therefore be explained in other ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2015449     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.158.1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  4 in total

1.  The Dubai Community Psychiatric Survey: I. Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates.

Authors:  R Ghubash; E Hamdi; P Bebbington
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The Camberwell Community Survey: a summary of results.

Authors:  P E Bebbington; J Hurry; C Tennant
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 3.  Additive effects, but no synergistic interaction of stressful life-events and genetic loading in affective disorders.

Authors:  J Fritze; B Schneider; K Maurer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Life events before psychotic episodes: do clinical and social variables affect the relationship?

Authors:  P Bebbington; S Wilkins; P Sham; P Jones; J van Os; R Murray; B Toone; S Lewis
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.328

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.