Literature DB >> 20154428

A comparison of outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) For early gastric neoplasms between high-volume and low-volume centers: multi-center retrospective questionnaire study conducted by the Nagano ESD Study Group.

Kinichi Hotta1, Tsuneo Oyama, Taiji Akamatsu, Akihisa Tomori, Osamu Hasebe, Naoshi Nakamura, Eigo Kojima, Tomoaki Suga, Hideharu Miyabayashi, Hiroshi Ohta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasms at low-volume centers have been unknown, because all previous reports have studied in advanced single centers. The aim of this study was to compare ESD outcomes between high- and low-volume centers.
METHODS: A retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted and 30 centers (96.8%) responded. The complete en-bloc resection rate (CERR) and the incidence of complications were analyzed. Early gastric cancer (EGC) was divided into three categories on the basis of pathological diagnosis-standard indication (SI), expanded indication (EI) and out-of-indication (OI).
RESULTS: A total of 703 early gastric neoplasms (586 EGCs, 117 gastric adenomas) were treated with ESD from January to December 2005. The institutions that treated more than 30 cases a year were classified as high-volume centers, and those with less than 30 cases, low-volume centers. In SI, the CERRs at high- and low-volume centers were 92.1% and 91.1%, in EI, CERRs were 86.2% and 82.6% and in OI, CERRs were 80.3% and 88.0%. The perforation rates at high- and low-volume centers were 3.6% and 4.7%. The intra-operative bleeding rates at high- and low-volume centers were 0.26% and 0%, while the delayed bleeding rates were 0% and 0.63%.
CONCLUSION: There were no significant difference in the outcomes of ESD for early gastric neoplasms between high- and low volume centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20154428     DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.2816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med        ISSN: 0918-2918            Impact factor:   1.271


  17 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection--current success and future directions.

Authors:  Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Endoscopic removal of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors: can we GIST-ify the risk?

Authors:  Christopher A Marshall; Benjamin J Hyatt; Wahid Wassef
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Are we making progress in diagnosing and preventing gastrointestinal cancers?

Authors:  Jelle Haringsma; Nicoline C M van Heel; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  Long-term outcomes after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer according to hospital volumes in Japan: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Osamu Dohi; Waku Hatta; Takuji Gotoda; Yuji Naito; Tsuneo Oyama; Noboru Kawata; Akiko Takahashi; Shiro Oka; Shu Hoteya; Masahiro Nakagawa; Masaaki Hirano; Mitsuru Esaki; Mitsuru Matsuda; Ken Ohnita; Ryo Shimoda; Motoyuki Yoshida; Jun Takada; Keiko Tanaka; Shinya Yamada; Tsuyotoshi Tsuji; Hirotaka Ito; Hiroyuki Aoyagi; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The expansion of endoscopic submucosal dissection in France: A prospective nationwide survey.

Authors:  Maximilien Barret; Vincent Lepilliez; Dimitri Coumaros; Stanislas Chaussade; Sarah Leblanc; Thierry Ponchon; Fabien Fumex; Edouard Chabrun; Paul Bauret; Christophe Cellier; Emmanuel Coron; Philippe Bichard; Philippe Bulois; Antoine Charachon; Gabriel Rahmi; Serge Bellon; Marc Lerhun; Jean-Pierre Arpurt; Stéphane Koch; Bertrand Napoleon; Eric Vaillant; Anouk Esch; Said Farhat; Francoise Robin; Nadira Kaddour; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yang Won Min; Byung-Hoon Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Jae J Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: the influence of hospital volume on complications and length of stay.

Authors:  Atsuhiko Murata; Kohji Okamoto; Keiji Muramatsu; Shinya Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Effects of Early Initiation of Solid Versus Liquid Diet after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on Quality of Life and Postoperative Outcomes: A Prospective Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Akihiro Miyakawa; Satoshi Kodera; Yukie Sakuma; Taro Shimada; Manabu Kubota; Akira Nakamura; Ei Itobayashi; Haruhisa Shimura; Yoshio Suzuki; Yasunori Sato; Kenji Shimura
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 9.  The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Young-Mi Park; Eun Cho; Hye-Young Kang; Jong-Mann Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The current state of diagnosis and treatment for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yada; Chizu Yokoi; Naomi Uemura
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.