Literature DB >> 20153700

Prospective randomized trial comparing dissection with Plastibell® circumcision.

José Murillo Bastos Netto1, José Gonçalves de Araújo, Marcos Flávio de Almeida Noronha, Bruno Rezende Passos, José de Bessa, André Avarese Figueiredo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate dissection and Plastibell(®) circumcision techniques for the treatment of phimosis.
METHODS: In 2006-2007, 125 children were submitted to circumcision by the same surgeon. The children were randomly divided into two groups (PD: Plastibell(®) and DC: dissection). In both groups the surgery was performed under general anesthesia and dorsal penile block. The dissection circumcision used the double circular incision technique. Follow-up was done on days 15, 45 and 90 after surgery.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included in DC and 57 in PD. The mean age at surgery was 71.76 ± 31.56 months for DC and 70.95 ± 31.73 months for PD. There was no difference in Kayaba's classification for phimosis or indication for surgery between the groups. Surgical time for DC was 14.64 ± 1.93 min and for PD 3.29 ± 1.48 min (P < 0.001). The incidence of immediate complications was similar, but late complications, especially adhesions, were greater in DC (P < 0.01). The use of pain medication (paracetamol) was similar during the first 2 days after surgery, but was greater in PD from the 3rd day after surgery (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Plastibell(®) circumcision has a shorter surgical duration with fewer late complications, but requires more analgesic medication after the 3rd day post surgery.
Copyright © 2010 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153700     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  4 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Comparison of ring instruments and classic circumcision methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yavuz Güler; Gökhun Çağdaş Özmerdiven; Akif Erbin
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Plastibell circumcision supported by a calcium-alginate fibre dressing to reduce bleeding.

Authors:  Ravisankar G Pillai; Ziad Al Naieb
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-05-19

4.  Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nick Zavras; Stella Tsamoudaki; Efstratios Christianakis; Demetrios Schizas; Emmanuel Pikoulis; Helen Kyritsi; George Chrousos
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.