Literature DB >> 20153048

Surface structural conformations of fibrinogen polypeptides for improved biocompatibility.

Mohammed Yaseen1, Xiubo Zhao, Amy Freund, Alexander M Seifalian, Jian R Lu.   

Abstract

This work reports on how incorporation of silica nanocages into poly(urethane) copolymers (PU) affects conformational orientations of adsorbed fibrinogen and how different surfaces subsequently influenced HeLa cell attachment and proliferation. Incorporation of 2 wt% silica nanocages into poly(urethane) (PU4) substantially altered the surface topography of the films and some 50% of the surface was covered with the nanocages due to their preferential exposure. AFM studies revealed the deposition of a dense protein network on the soft polymeric domains of PU4 and much reduced fibrinogen adsorption on the hard nanocage domains. As on the bare SiO(2) control surface, fibrinogen molecules adsorbed on top of the hard nanocages mainly took the dominant trinodular structures in monomeric and dimeric forms. In addition, net positively charged long alpha chains were prone to being hidden beneath the D domains whilst gamma chains predominantly remained exposed. Dynamic interfacial adsorption as probed by spectroscopic ellipsometry revealed fast changes in interfacial conformation induced by electrostatic interactions between different segments of fibrinogen and the surface, consistent with the AFM imaging. On the PU surfaces without nanocage incorporation (PUA), however, adsorbed fibrinogen molecules formed beads-like chain networks, consistent with the structure featured on the soft PU4 domains, showing very different effects of surface chemical nature. Monoclonal antibodies specific to the alpha and gamma chains showed reduced alpha but increased gamma chain binding at the silicon oxide control and PU4 surfaces, whilst on the PUA, C18 and amine surfaces (organic surface controls) the opposite binding trend was detected with alpha chain binding dominant, showing different fibrinogen conformations. Cell attachment studies revealed differences in cell attachment and proliferation, consistent with the different polypeptide conformations on the two types of surfaces, showing a strong preference to the extent of exposure of gamma chains. Crown Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153048     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  5 in total

1.  Surface modification of biomaterials: a quest for blood compatibility.

Authors:  Achala de Mel; Brian G Cousins; Alexander M Seifalian
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-05-27

Review 2.  Biomaterials-based modulation of the immune system.

Authors:  Austin B Gardner; Simon K C Lee; Elliot C Woods; Abhinav P Acharya
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Studying Interfacial Adsorption of Bioengineered Monoclonal Antibodies.

Authors:  Peter Hollowell; Zongyi Li; Xuzhi Hu; Sean Ruane; Cavan Kalonia; Christopher F van der Walle; Jian R Lu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Innate Immunity and Biomaterials at the Nexus: Friends or Foes.

Authors:  Susan N Christo; Kerrilyn R Diener; Akash Bachhuka; Krasimir Vasilev; John D Hayball
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Interfacial Assembly Inspired by Marine Mussels and Antifouling Effects of Polypeptoids: A Neutron Reflection Study.

Authors:  Fang Pan; King Hang Aaron Lau; Phillip B Messersmith; Jian R Lu; Xiubo Zhao
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.882

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.