BACKGROUND: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma combinations of interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil produce higher response rates and longer progression-free survival than do single agents. We aimed to compare overall survival in patients receiving combination treatment orinterferon alfa-2a. METHODS: RE04/30012 was an open-label randomised trial undertaken in 50 centres across eight countries. 1006 treatment-naive patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma were randomly allocated (1 to 1) by minimisation to receive interferon alfa-2a alone or combination therapy with interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil. Treatment was not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Treatment groups were compared with a non-stratified log-rank test. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 46518965. FINDINGS:502 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alfa-2a and 504 to receive combined treatment. Median follow-up was 37.2 months (24.8-52.3). Median overall survival was 18.8 months (17.0-23.2) for patients receiving interferon alfa-2a versus 18.6 months (16.5-20.6) for those receiving combination therapy. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.90-1.21], p=0.55; absolute difference 0.3% (-5.1 to 5.6) at 1 year and 2.7% (-8.2 to 2.9) at 3 years). Serious adverse events were reported in 113 (23%) patients receiving interferon alfa-2a and 131 (26%) of those receiving combined treatment. INTERPRETATION: Although combination therapy does not improve overall or progression-free survival compared with interferon alfa-2a alone, immunotherapy might still have a role because it can produce remissions that are of clinically relevant length in some patients. Identification of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy is crucial. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma combinations of interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil produce higher response rates and longer progression-free survival than do single agents. We aimed to compare overall survival in patients receiving combination treatment or interferon alfa-2a. METHODS: RE04/30012 was an open-label randomised trial undertaken in 50 centres across eight countries. 1006 treatment-naive patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma were randomly allocated (1 to 1) by minimisation to receive interferon alfa-2a alone or combination therapy with interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil. Treatment was not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Treatment groups were compared with a non-stratified log-rank test. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 46518965. FINDINGS: 502 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alfa-2a and 504 to receive combined treatment. Median follow-up was 37.2 months (24.8-52.3). Median overall survival was 18.8 months (17.0-23.2) for patients receiving interferon alfa-2a versus 18.6 months (16.5-20.6) for those receiving combination therapy. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.90-1.21], p=0.55; absolute difference 0.3% (-5.1 to 5.6) at 1 year and 2.7% (-8.2 to 2.9) at 3 years). Serious adverse events were reported in 113 (23%) patients receiving interferon alfa-2a and 131 (26%) of those receiving combined treatment. INTERPRETATION: Although combination therapy does not improve overall or progression-free survival compared with interferon alfa-2a alone, immunotherapy might still have a role because it can produce remissions that are of clinically relevant length in some patients. Identification of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy is crucial. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: S Pyrhönen; E Salminen; M Ruutu; T Lehtonen; M Nurmi; T Tammela; H Juusela; E Rintala; P Hietanen; P L Kellokumpu-Lehtinen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Seth M Steinberg; Suzanne L Topalian; Douglas J Schwartzentruber; Patrick Hwu; Claudia A Seipp; Linda Rogers-Freezer; Kathleen E Morton; Donald E White; David J Liewehr; Maria J Merino; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Atzpodien; H Kirchner; U Jonas; L Bergmann; H Schott; H Heynemann; P Fornara; S A Loening; J Roigas; S C Müller; H Bodenstein; S Pomer; B Metzner; U Rebmann; R Oberneder; M Siebels; T Wandert; T Puchberger; M Reitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Atzpodien; H Kirchner; H J Illiger; B Metzner; D Ukena; H Schott; P J Funke; M Gramatzki; S Jürgenson; T Wandert; T Patzelt; M Reitz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-10-19 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Christian Doehn; Viktor Grünwald; Thomas Steiner; Markus Follmann; Heidrun Rexer; Susanne Krege Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 5.594