Literature DB >> 20153016

Is primate-like quadrupedalism necessary for fine-branch locomotion? A test using sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps).

Liza J Shapiro1, Jesse W Young.   

Abstract

Locomotor features shared by arboreal marsupials and primates are frequently cited as a functional complex that evolved in the context of a "fine branch niche." Adaptation to a fine branch niche cannot be understood without considering that small and large arboreal mammals may differ in their biomechanical response to a given branch size. We tested the effects of substrate diameter and orientation on quadrupedal kinematics in a small arboreal marsupial (the sugar glider, Petaurus breviceps). P. breviceps individuals were filmed moving across a flat horizontal surface and on horizontal, inclining and declining poles of diameter 2.5, 1.0, and 0.5cm. Gait frequencies, limb phases, speeds and duty factors were compared across substrate conditions. P. breviceps had a clear preference for lateral sequence/diagonal couplets gaits, regardless of substrate type, diameter or orientation. Limb phase was significantly influenced by substrate type (higher limb phases on poles vs. the flat surface) and by orientation (higher limb phases on inclined vs. horizontal poles), but was not influenced by pole diameter. Speed was lowest on declines, and duty factors (at a given speed) were highest on the flat board, smallest pole, and on declines. P. breviceps exhibited some parallels, but also some departures from the characteristic patterns of other arboreal marsupials and primates. Notably, limb phase values, on average, remained lower in P. breviceps than those recorded for primates or other arboreal marsupials. We suggest that arboreal mammals of different body sizes may use dissimilar, but apparently equally successful strategies for navigating a "fine branch niche." Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153016     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  7 in total

1.  Competing Models of Work in Quadrupedal Walking: Center of Mass Work is Insufficient to Explain Stereotypical Gait.

Authors:  Delyle T Polet; John E A Bertram
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-12

2.  Treadmill locomotion of the mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus); kinematic parameters during symmetrical and asymmetrical gaits.

Authors:  Marc Herbin; Eva Hommet; Vicky Hanotin-Dossot; Martine Perret; Rémi Hackert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Investigation on Inter-Limb Coordination and Motion Stability, Intensity and Complexity of Trunk and Limbs during Hands-Knees Crawling in Human Adults.

Authors:  Shenglan Ma; Xiang Chen; Shuai Cao; Yi Yu; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Limb phase flexibility in walking: a test case in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  Charlotte Elizabeth Miller; Laura Elizabeth Johnson; Henry Pinkard; Pierre Lemelin; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Tiger Salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) Increase Foot Contact Surface Area on Challenging Substrates During Terrestrial Locomotion.

Authors:  Christine M Vega; Miriam A Ashley-Ross
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-09-21

6.  Forelimb preferences in quadrupedal marsupials and their implications for laterality evolution in mammals.

Authors:  Andrey Giljov; Karina Karenina; Yegor Malashichev
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Geckos decouple fore- and hind limb kinematics in response to changes in incline.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.