BACKGROUND: Abnormal cardiac stress imaging findings are not always associated with angiographically significant coronary artery disease. The outcomes of patients with such false-positive findings have not been extensively examined. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with abnormal stress echocardiographic findings who had false-positive results compared with those who had true-positive results. METHODS: Of 1,477 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 +/- 12 years; 61% men) with abnormal stress echocardiographic findings who underwent coronary arteriography within 30 days, death from any cause was ascertained. RESULTS: At coronary arteriography, 997 patients (67.5%) had true-positive results, defined by the presence of angiographically significant coronary artery disease (> or = 50% stenoses), and 480 (32.5%) had false-positive results, defined by <50% stenoses or normal coronary arteries. Of the subgroup of patients with markedly abnormal stress echocardiographic findings (n = 605), 28% had <50% stenoses or normal coronary arteries. During an average follow-up period of 2.4 +/- 1.0 years, there were 140 deaths. The adjusted likelihood of subsequent death for patients with <50% stenoses compared to patients with > or = 50% stenoses after abnormal stress echocardiography was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.31; P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: A sizable proportion of patients with abnormal stress echocardiographic results who are referred for coronary angiography have false-positive findings. The outcomes of patients with false-positive results were similar to those of patients with true-positive results. This finding suggests that patients with false-positive results on stress echocardiography should still receive intensive risk factor management and careful clinical follow-up. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND:Abnormal cardiac stress imaging findings are not always associated with angiographically significant coronary artery disease. The outcomes of patients with such false-positive findings have not been extensively examined. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with abnormal stress echocardiographic findings who had false-positive results compared with those who had true-positive results. METHODS: Of 1,477 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 +/- 12 years; 61% men) with abnormal stress echocardiographic findings who underwent coronary arteriography within 30 days, death from any cause was ascertained. RESULTS: At coronary arteriography, 997 patients (67.5%) had true-positive results, defined by the presence of angiographically significant coronary artery disease (> or = 50% stenoses), and 480 (32.5%) had false-positive results, defined by <50% stenoses or normal coronary arteries. Of the subgroup of patients with markedly abnormal stress echocardiographic findings (n = 605), 28% had <50% stenoses or normal coronary arteries. During an average follow-up period of 2.4 +/- 1.0 years, there were 140 deaths. The adjusted likelihood of subsequent death for patients with <50% stenoses compared to patients with > or = 50% stenoses after abnormal stress echocardiography was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.31; P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: A sizable proportion of patients with abnormal stress echocardiographic results who are referred for coronary angiography have false-positive findings. The outcomes of patients with false-positive results were similar to those of patients with true-positive results. This finding suggests that patients with false-positive results on stress echocardiography should still receive intensive risk factor management and careful clinical follow-up. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Sahar Taqui; Maros Ferencik; Brian P Davidson; J Todd Belcik; Federico Moccetti; Michael Layoun; Jacob Raber; Mitchell Turker; Hagai Tavori; Sergio Fazio; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Mathieu Bernier; Mary E Hagen; Susan Eifert-Rain; Dalene Bott-Kitslaar; Susan Wilansky; Ramon Castello; Gajanan Bhat; Patricia A Pellikka; Patricia J M Best; Sharonne N Hayes; Sharon L Mulvagh Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.681