Literature DB >> 20152696

Do additional echocardiographic variables increase the accuracy of E/e' for predicting left ventricular filling pressure in normal ejection fraction? An echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic study.

Hisham Dokainish1, John S Nguyen, Ranjita Sengupta, Manu Pillai, Mahboob Alam, Jaromir Bobek, Nasser Lakkis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are few data on adding left atrial volume index (LAVi) or pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAP) to the ratio of early mitral inflow to mitral annular velocity (E/e') for the estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in patients with preserved LV ejection fractions (LVEFs) (>50%).
METHODS: Patients underwent echocardiography within 20 minutes of cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographic variables were compared with invasively measured LV preatrial contraction pressure (pre-A).
RESULTS: Of the 122 patients studied (mean age, 55 +/- 9 years; mean LVEF, 61 +/- 6%), 67 (55%) were women, 108 (88%) had hypertension, and 79 (65%) had significant coronary artery disease at catheterization. E/e' was significantly correlated with pre-A (R = 0.63, P < .0001) compared with LAVi (R = 0.49, P < .001) and PAP (R = 0.48, P < .001). E/e' > 13 had sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 93% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.82; P < .0001), LAVi > 31 mL/m2 had sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 76% (AUC, 0.80, P < .001), and PAP > 28 mm Hg had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 64% for pre-A > 15 mm Hg (AUC, 0.77, P < .001). Adding LAVi >31 mL/m2 for E/e' = 8 to 13 significantly increased the accuracy of E/e' > 13 alone (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 88%; AUC, 0.89; P = .01 for comparison). However, adding PAP > 28 mm Hg for E/e' = 8 to 13 did not significantly increase the accuracy of E/e' > 13 alone (AUC, 0.82; sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 72%; P = NS for comparison).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with preserved LVEFs, adding LAVi > 31 mL/m2 to E/e' (when E/e' was in the gray zone, but not when E/e' was >13) significantly increased the accuracy of E/e' alone for the estimation of LV filling pressure. These data support the notion of using several, rather than any single, Doppler echocardiographic parameter for the accurate assessment of LV diastolic function. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20152696     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Relevance of the Spectral Tissue Doppler E/e' Ratio in the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stephane Arques
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-08-31

2.  Noninvasive prediction of the exercise-induced elevation in left ventricular filling pressure in post-heart transplant patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jaroslav Meluzin; Petr Hude; Jan Krejci; Lenka Spinarova; Helena Podrouzkova; Pavel Leinveber; Ladislav Dusek; Vladimir Soska; Josef Tomandl; Petr Nemec
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013

Review 3.  The Role of Echocardiography in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: What Do We Want from Imaging?

Authors:  Masaru Obokata; Yogesh N V Reddy; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.179

4.  Left atrial strain associated with alterations in cardiac diastolic function in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Cuiling Li; Jingwei Zhang; Rui Fan; Wei Li; Yanqiu Liu; Donghong Liu; Hong Lin; Fengjuan Yao; Min Ye; Wei He
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  LA Strain for Categorization of LV Diastolic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Karima Addetia; Francesco Maffessanti; Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 6.  Diastolic stress test for the evaluation of exertional dyspnea.

Authors:  Garvan C Kane; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Left ventricular diastolic function and dysfunction: Central role of echocardiography.

Authors:  Hisham Dokainish
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2015-01-26

8.  Left atrial and right atrial deformation in patients with coronary artery disease: a velocity vector imaging-based study.

Authors:  Ping Yan; Bin Sun; Haiming Shi; Wen Zhu; Qing Zhou; Yuwen Jiang; Hui Zhu; Guoqian Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relationship of CHA2DS2-VASc and CHADS2 score to left atrial remodeling detected by velocity vector imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yihui Li; Wenyuan Ding; Hua Wang; Nianpeng Song; Leyu Lin; Zhihao Wang; Ming Zhong; Yun Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Tissue Doppler Index E/e' for Evaluating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure and Diastolic Dysfunction/Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Oleg F Sharifov; Chun G Schiros; Inmaculada Aban; Thomas S Denney; Himanshu Gupta
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.