INTRODUCTION: Proponents of peritoneal drainage (PD) hypothesize that it allows stabilization before laparotomy. We examined this hypothesis by comparing clinical status before and after either PD or primary laparotomy (LAP). METHODS: In an ethically approved, international, prospective randomized controlled trial (2002-2006), extremely low birth weight (<1000 g) infants with pneumoperitoneum received primary PD (n = 35) or LAP (n = 34). Physiologic data were collected prospectively and organ failure scores calculated and compared between preprocedure and day 1 after procedure. Data, expressed as mean +/- SD or median (range), were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There was no postprocedure improvement in either PD or LAP group comparing heart rate (PD, P = 1.0; LAP, P = .6), blood pressure (PD, P = .6; LAP, P = .8), inotrope requirement (PD, P = .2; LAP, P = .3), or Arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PD, P = .1; LAP, P = .5). Infants managed with PD had a worsening cardiovascular status (P = .05). There were no differences in total organ failure score in either group (PD, P = .5; LAP, P = 1). Only 4 infants survived with PD alone with no difference between preprocedure and postprocedure organ failure score (P = .4). CONCLUSIONS:Peritoneal drainage does not immediately improve clinical status in extremely low birth weight infants with bowel perforation. The use of PD as a stabilizing or temporizing measure is not supported by these results. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Proponents of peritoneal drainage (PD) hypothesize that it allows stabilization before laparotomy. We examined this hypothesis by comparing clinical status before and after either PD or primary laparotomy (LAP). METHODS: In an ethically approved, international, prospective randomized controlled trial (2002-2006), extremely low birth weight (<1000 g) infants with pneumoperitoneum received primary PD (n = 35) or LAP (n = 34). Physiologic data were collected prospectively and organ failure scores calculated and compared between preprocedure and day 1 after procedure. Data, expressed as mean +/- SD or median (range), were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There was no postprocedure improvement in either PD or LAP group comparing heart rate (PD, P = 1.0; LAP, P = .6), blood pressure (PD, P = .6; LAP, P = .8), inotrope requirement (PD, P = .2; LAP, P = .3), or Arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PD, P = .1; LAP, P = .5). Infants managed with PD had a worsening cardiovascular status (P = .05). There were no differences in total organ failure score in either group (PD, P = .5; LAP, P = 1). Only 4 infants survived with PD alone with no difference between preprocedure and postprocedure organ failure score (P = .4). CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal drainage does not immediately improve clinical status in extremely low birth weight infants with bowel perforation. The use of PD as a stabilizing or temporizing measure is not supported by these results. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Anne Stey; Elizabeth S Barnert; Chi-Hong Tseng; Emmett Keeler; Jack Needleman; Mei Leng; Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; Stephen B Shew Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Marie-Chantal Struijs; Cornelius E J Sloots; Wim C J Hop; Dick Tibboel; Rene M H Wijnen Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2012-04-21 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Sonja Zamrik; Federica Giachero; Michael Heldmann; Kai O Hensel; Stefan Wirth; Andreas C Jenke Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: W C Canesin; F A P Volpe; W A Gonçalves-Ferri; P H Manso; D C Aragon; L Sbragia Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 2.590