Literature DB >> 2015230

Three-dimensional structure of murine anti-p-azophenylarsonate Fab 36-71. 2. Structural basis of hapten binding and idiotypy.

R K Strong1, G A Petsko, J Sharon, M N Margolies.   

Abstract

Comparison between the structures and solvent-accessible surfaces of the antigen-binding fragments of two murine anti-p-azophenylarsonate monoclonal antibodies, one bearing a major cross-reactive idiotype of A/J strain mice (36-71) and one lacking the idiotype (R19.9; Lascombe et al., 1989), highlight the structural basis for the determination of hapten affinity and idiotypy. Since the sequence of R 19.9 is identical with the germline-encoded sequence at 16 positions in both heavy-chain and light-chain variable regions where somatic mutations and junctional differences have occurred to produce the 36-71 sequence, the structure of R 19.9 can be used to model the structure of the germline-encoded antibody (36-65) in the regions around these sites. These 16 sequence differences exclude the third heavy-chain complementarity-determining region because R 19.9 utilizes a D gene segment not associated with the predominant idiotype, which is 4 residues longer than the canonical D gene segment utilized in the sequences of 36-71 and 36-65. This difference between the structures of R 19.9 and 36-71 does not affect the validity of using the structure of R 19.9 to model the structure of 36-65 since the third heavy-chain complementarity-determining region is highly solvent-exposed in both 36-71 and R 19.9, and does not interact with any of these 16 sites. Comparing the structures of 36-71 and R 19.9 suggests that only three of the differences in the heavy-chain sequences, and three of the differences in the light-chain sequences of 36-71 and 36-65, increase the affinity for hapten.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2015230     DOI: 10.1021/bi00229a023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  7 in total

1.  Can immunoglobulin C(H)1 constant region domain modulate antigen binding affinity of antibodies?

Authors:  O Pritsch; G Hudry-Clergeon; M Buckle; Y Petillot; J P Bouvet; J Gagnon; G Dighiero
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Characterizing the microenvironment surrounding protein sites.

Authors:  S C Bagley; R B Altman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Anti-peptide monoclonal antibody imaging of a common binding domain involved in muscle regulation.

Authors:  J E Van Eyk; R A Caday-Malcolm; L Yu; R T Irvin; R S Hodges
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Three-dimensional structure of two crystal forms of FabR19.9 from a monoclonal anti-arsonate antibody.

Authors:  M B Lascombe; P M Alzari; R J Poljak; A Nisonoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Functional analysis of the antigen binding site on the T cell receptor alpha chain.

Authors:  E A Nalefski; S Kasibhatla; A Rao
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  The structural basis of repertoire shift in an immune response to phosphocholine.

Authors:  M Brown; M A Schumacher; G D Wiens; R G Brennan; M B Rittenberg
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2000-06-19       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Random mutagenesis of two complementarity determining region amino acids yields an unexpectedly high frequency of antibodies with increased affinity for both cognate antigen and autoantigen.

Authors:  L P Casson; T Manser
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.