BACKGROUND: In a previous meta-analysis on the approved treatments for pulmonary hypertension, we reported that all therapies caused small changes in 6-minute walk distance over a short period, with minimal effects on hemodynamics and no effect on survival. Since that last review, 10 new clinical trials with about 1,500 patients have been published, which has increased the statistical power of our observations. METHODS: A systematic review of all clinical trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension was done. RESULTS: The pooled effect of all treatments strategies (relative risk [95% CI], P) now shows a significant reduction of 39% (2%-62%, P = .041) in all-cause mortality. The benefits were confined only to patients with advanced disease for 16 weeks, regardless of which class of drug is used. When considering the effects within each drug family, no class of drug produced a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality. The improved survival bore no relationship with the change in 6-minute walk, the primary end point in most of the trials. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of vasodilators on long-term survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension remains uncertain. Future trials need to (a) adopt new trial designs that can better address clinical benefits, (b) use new end points that incorporate our best understanding of the disease rather than the ones that are easy to administer, and (c) include longer durations of study and other strategies to clarify if survival is affected. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: In a previous meta-analysis on the approved treatments for pulmonary hypertension, we reported that all therapies caused small changes in 6-minute walk distance over a short period, with minimal effects on hemodynamics and no effect on survival. Since that last review, 10 new clinical trials with about 1,500 patients have been published, which has increased the statistical power of our observations. METHODS: A systematic review of all clinical trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension was done. RESULTS: The pooled effect of all treatments strategies (relative risk [95% CI], P) now shows a significant reduction of 39% (2%-62%, P = .041) in all-cause mortality. The benefits were confined only to patients with advanced disease for 16 weeks, regardless of which class of drug is used. When considering the effects within each drug family, no class of drug produced a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality. The improved survival bore no relationship with the change in 6-minute walk, the primary end point in most of the trials. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of vasodilators on long-term survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension remains uncertain. Future trials need to (a) adopt new trial designs that can better address clinical benefits, (b) use new end points that incorporate our best understanding of the disease rather than the ones that are easy to administer, and (c) include longer durations of study and other strategies to clarify if survival is affected. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Norbert F Voelkel; Jose Gomez-Arroyo; Antonio Abbate; Harm J Bogaard; Mark R Nicolls Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Serpil Erzurum; Sharon I Rounds; Troy Stevens; Micheala Aldred; Jason Aliotta; Stephen L Archer; Kewal Asosingh; Robert Balaban; Natalie Bauer; Jahar Bhattacharya; Harm Bogaard; Gaurav Choudhary; Gerald W Dorn; Raed Dweik; Karen Fagan; Michael Fallon; Toren Finkel; Mark Geraci; Mark T Gladwin; Paul M Hassoun; Marc Humbert; Naftali Kaminski; Steven M Kawut; Joseph Loscalzo; Donald McDonald; Ivan F McMurtry; John Newman; Mark Nicolls; Marlene Rabinovitch; Judy Shizuru; Masahiko Oka; Peter Polgar; David Rodman; Paul Schumacker; Kurt Stenmark; Rubin Tuder; Norbert Voelkel; Eugene Sullivan; Richard Weinshilboum; Mervin C Yoder; Yingming Zhao; Dorothy Gail; Timothy M Moore Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Daniela Farkas; A A Roger Thompson; Aneel R Bhagwani; Schuyler Hultman; Hyun Ji; Naveen Kotha; Grant Farr; Nadine D Arnold; Adam Braithwaite; Helen Casbolt; Jennifer E Cole; Ian Sabroe; Claudia Monaco; Carlyne D Cool; Elena A Goncharova; Allan Lawrie; Laszlo Farkas Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Soni Savai Pullamsetti; Rajkumar Savai; Werner Seeger; Elena A Goncharova Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: John H Newman; Stuart Rich; Steven H Abman; John H Alexander; John Barnard; Gerald J Beck; Raymond L Benza; Todd M Bull; Stephen Y Chan; Hyung J Chun; Declan Doogan; Jocelyn Dupuis; Serpil C Erzurum; Robert P Frantz; Mark Geraci; Hunter Gillies; Mark Gladwin; Michael P Gray; Anna R Hemnes; Roy S Herbst; Adrian F Hernandez; Nicholas S Hill; Evelyn M Horn; Kendall Hunter; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Roger Johns; Sanjay Kaul; Steven M Kawut; Tim Lahm; Jane A Leopold; Greg D Lewis; Stephen C Mathai; Vallerie V McLaughlin; Evangelos D Michelakis; Steven D Nathan; William Nichols; Grier Page; Marlene Rabinovitch; Jonathan Rich; Franz Rischard; Sharon Rounds; Sanjiv J Shah; Victor F Tapson; Naomi Lowy; Norman Stockbridge; Gail Weinmann; Lei Xiao Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 21.405