BACKGROUND: We hypothesise that text-messaging and financial incentives would increase tertiary student participation in chlamydia screening. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted over two phases on eight tertiary campuses during 2007. During Phase 1 (6 months) study activities were advertised through student organisations and media. Education and screening were offered during a range of student activities. During Phase 2 (4 days) education and screening were offered via text messages. Non-financial incentives were offered during Phase 1 and a $10 cash incentive was offered during Phase 2. Rates of specimens provided by students and the direct costs incurred during each phase were compared. RESULTS: 2786 students attended the 31 activities conducted in Phase 1. Of these, 627 students (22.5%) provided urine specimens for chlamydia testing. During Phase 2, the dissemination of 866 text messages resulted in urine specimens from 392 students (45.3%). Costs per test were AUD $175.11 in Phase 1 and AUD $27.13 in Phase 2. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with more labour intensive (and therefore more expensive) screening activities conducted over a 6-month period, offering a small financial incentive to tertiary students through text messaging over a 4-day period significantly increased participation in on-campus chlamydia screening. This model could readily be applied to other populations to increase participation in chlamydia screening.
BACKGROUND: We hypothesise that text-messaging and financial incentives would increase tertiary student participation in chlamydia screening. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted over two phases on eight tertiary campuses during 2007. During Phase 1 (6 months) study activities were advertised through student organisations and media. Education and screening were offered during a range of student activities. During Phase 2 (4 days) education and screening were offered via text messages. Non-financial incentives were offered during Phase 1 and a $10 cash incentive was offered during Phase 2. Rates of specimens provided by students and the direct costs incurred during each phase were compared. RESULTS: 2786 students attended the 31 activities conducted in Phase 1. Of these, 627 students (22.5%) provided urine specimens for chlamydia testing. During Phase 2, the dissemination of 866 text messages resulted in urine specimens from 392 students (45.3%). Costs per test were AUD $175.11 in Phase 1 and AUD $27.13 in Phase 2. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with more labour intensive (and therefore more expensive) screening activities conducted over a 6-month period, offering a small financial incentive to tertiary students through text messaging over a 4-day period significantly increased participation in on-campus chlamydia screening. This model could readily be applied to other populations to increase participation in chlamydia screening.
Authors: Judith B Cornelius; Janet S St Lawrence; Jacquelyn C Howard; Deval Shah; Avinash Poka; Delilah McDonald; Ann C White Journal: J Spec Pediatr Nurs Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 1.260
Authors: Judith B Cornelius; Jacek Dmochowski; Cherrie Boyer; Janet St Lawrence; Marguerita Lightfoot; Michael Moore Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Ivana Božičević; Ivana Grgić; Snježana Židovec-Lepej; Jurja-Ivana Čakalo; Sanja Belak-Kovačević; Aleksandar Štulhofer; Josip Begovac Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Dominik Zenner; Darko Molinar; Tom Nichols; Johanna Riha; Mary Macintosh; Anthony Nardone Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Francis J Bowden; Marian J Currie; Muareen Todkill; Mathias Schmidt; Sue Webeck; Rendry Del Rosario; Tim Bavinton; Alexandra Tyson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 3.295