Literature DB >> 20152093

Misclassification bias: diversity in conceptualisations about having 'had sex'.

Stephanie A Sanders1, Brandon J Hill, William L Yarber, Cynthia A Graham, Richard A Crosby, Robin R Milhausen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the signification of the word 'sex' has implications for both medical research and clinical practice. Little is known about how people of varying ages define sex and how situational qualifiers influence definitions across age groups. To our knowledge, this is the first study of a representative sample to assess attitudes about which sexual behaviours constitute having 'had sex' and to examine possible mediating factors (gender, age, giving/receiving stimulation, male ejaculation, female orgasm, condom use or brevity).
METHODS: A telephone survey of English-speaking residents of Indiana (USA) using random-digit-dialling produced a final sample of 204 men and 282 women (n = 486) ranging in age from 18 to 96 years. Questions assessed the respondents' attitudes on manual-genital (MG), oral-genital (OG), penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI) and penile-anal intercourse (PAI) behaviours.
RESULTS: There was no universal consensus on which behaviours constituted having 'had sex'. More than 90% responded 'yes' to PVI but one in five responded 'no' to PAI, three in 10 responded 'no' to OG and about half endorsed MG. Fewer endorsed PVI with no male ejaculation (89.1%) compared with PVI without a qualifier (94.8%, P < 0.001). MG was endorsed more often when received (48.1%) than given (44.9%, P < 0.001). Among men, the oldest and youngest age groups were significantly less likely to believe certain behaviours constituted having 'had sex'.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need to use behaviour-specific terminology in sexual history taking, sex research, sexual health promotion and sex education. Researchers, educators and medical practitioners should exercise caution and not assume that their own definitions of having 'had sex' are shared by their research participants or patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20152093     DOI: 10.1071/SH09068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Health        ISSN: 1448-5028            Impact factor:   2.706


  12 in total

1.  Assessing the Reliability of Self-Reported Sexual Behavior Among Male Couples.

Authors:  Alison R Walsh; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-02-09

2.  Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of U.S. singles.

Authors:  Justin R Garcia; Elisabeth A Lloyd; Kim Wallen; Helen E Fisher
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  More than the sum of their parts: A dyad-centered approach to understanding adolescent sexual behavior.

Authors:  Sara A Vasilenko
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2021-01-06

4.  Debunking Lesbian Bed Death: Using Coarsened Exact Matching to Compare Sexual Practices and Satisfaction of Lesbian and Heterosexual Women.

Authors:  David A Frederick; Brian Joseph Gillespie; Janet Lever; Vincent Berardi; Justin R Garcia
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Assessing the Within-Person Variability of Internal and External Sexual Consent.

Authors:  Malachi Willis; Kristen N Jozkowski; Ana J Bridges; Jennifer C Veilleux; Robert E Davis
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  Pharyngeal Gonorrhoea in Women: An Important Reservoir for Increasing Neisseria gonorrhoea Prevalence in Urban Australian Heterosexuals?

Authors:  M Josephine Lusk; Ruby N N Uddin; Monica M Lahra; Frances L Garden; Ratan L Kundu; Pam Konecny
Journal:  J Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-06-26

7.  Graded Structure in Sexual Definitions: Categorizations of Having "Had Sex" and Virginity Loss Among Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women.

Authors:  Ava D Horowitz; Edward Bedford
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-12-05

8.  Reported oral and anal sex among adolescents and adults reporting heterosexual sex in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Imran O Morhason-Bello; Severin Kabakama; Kathy Baisley; Suzanna C Francis; Deborah Watson-Jones
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Asexuality vs. sexual interest/arousal disorder: Examining group differences in initial attention to sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Julia Bradshaw; Natalie Brown; Alan Kingstone; Lori Brotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018.

Authors:  Peter Ueda; Catherine H Mercer; Cyrus Ghaznavi; Debby Herbenick
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.