BACKGROUND: This report was conducted to elucidate the current status of spinal endoscopic surgery and relevant incidents through analysis of the results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA). METHODS: Questionnaire forms were sent to 2011 training facilities nationwide certified by the JOA, and 1082 of these facilities returned the filled questionnaires (response rate 53.8%). Of these facilities, 257 (23.8% of the responding facilities) undertook spinal endoscopic surgery in 2007. These institutions were asked to fill in the survey form with the details of the operations and relevant incidents as well as the incident levels. RESULTS: In total, the 257 facilities performed 6239 spinal endoscopic surgeries during 2007. Posterior spinal endoscopic surgery constituted most of the operations (6217 cases, 98.2%) including 4336 cases of microendoscopic discectomy (MED), 1273 cases of microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 379 cases of transforaminal or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The total number of incidents was 133 (2.13%). The numbers of incidents by operative method were 75 (56.4%) during MED, 57 (42.9%) during microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 1 (0.8%) during interbody fusion. Of 133 incidents, dural tear occurred in 99 (74.4%), injury of the cauda equina or a nerve root in 7 (5.3%), facet fracture in 7 (5.3%), hematoma and wrong level in 6 each (4.5%), and wrong side and bedsore in 1 each (0.8%). The incident level was level 1 in 6, level 2 in 24, level 3a in 82, level 3b in 16, level 4 in 5, and level 5 (fatal) in 0. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey revealed an increasing trend of spinal endoscopic surgery and a decreasing trend of the complication rates. The complication rates of spinal endoscopic surgery were not higher than those of conventional surgery, indicating the safety of this surgical method.
BACKGROUND: This report was conducted to elucidate the current status of spinal endoscopic surgery and relevant incidents through analysis of the results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA). METHODS: Questionnaire forms were sent to 2011 training facilities nationwide certified by the JOA, and 1082 of these facilities returned the filled questionnaires (response rate 53.8%). Of these facilities, 257 (23.8% of the responding facilities) undertook spinal endoscopic surgery in 2007. These institutions were asked to fill in the survey form with the details of the operations and relevant incidents as well as the incident levels. RESULTS: In total, the 257 facilities performed 6239 spinal endoscopic surgeries during 2007. Posterior spinal endoscopic surgery constituted most of the operations (6217 cases, 98.2%) including 4336 cases of microendoscopic discectomy (MED), 1273 cases of microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 379 cases of transforaminal or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The total number of incidents was 133 (2.13%). The numbers of incidents by operative method were 75 (56.4%) during MED, 57 (42.9%) during microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 1 (0.8%) during interbody fusion. Of 133 incidents, dural tear occurred in 99 (74.4%), injury of the cauda equina or a nerve root in 7 (5.3%), facet fracture in 7 (5.3%), hematoma and wrong level in 6 each (4.5%), and wrong side and bedsore in 1 each (0.8%). The incident level was level 1 in 6, level 2 in 24, level 3a in 82, level 3b in 16, level 4 in 5, and level 5 (fatal) in 0. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey revealed an increasing trend of spinal endoscopic surgery and a decreasing trend of the complication rates. The complication rates of spinal endoscopic surgery were not higher than those of conventional surgery, indicating the safety of this surgical method.
Authors: Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2012-03-09